UP CLOSE: The new Yale community

UP CLOSE:
The new Yale community

Published on September 17, 2020

Strolling Cross Campus at this time of year typically treats passers-by to a warm sight — frisbee games, prospective students touring the grounds, friends sitting together on the grass with pages of reading. This semester, the front lawn of Sterling Memorial Library looks the same at first glance, with people scattered on the grass and lawn games abound. 

But on closer inspection, you notice the extra benches placed six feet apart and the masks covering students’ faces. Signs remind students to “practice social distancing” and to “stay at least two arms’ length away from others.”

The COVID-19 pandemic has fundamentally changed the way Yale functions this semester. Remote classes and restrictions on social gatherings have limited how students are able to interact with one another. Yale required all enrolled students returning to New Haven to sign a community compact that delineates what is and is not allowed regarding social interactions and outlines potential administrative action in case of a violation. For the first two weeks after their initial arrival, on-campus students could not leave their respective residential colleges — making what is typically touted as a central pillar of Yale community life into an insulated bubble for the start of term. And while Yale’s strong student life has long been a selling point for the University, both student leaders and administrators are keenly aware of how the coronavirus pandemic challenges that strength.

“How we go about maintaining a vibrant social life at Yale is definitely a question that does not have any sufficient answers at the moment,” Yale College Council President Kahlil Greene ’21 told the News. “One of my FroCo friends said that he polled his kids to see who feared they would end the year without a single close friend. All of them raised their hands.”

PLAYING IT BY EAR

(Yale News)

University President Peter Salovey emailed the Yale community on July 1 to announce Yale’s fall plans: a semester of primarily remote instruction, with an invitation to live on a socially-distant, pandemic-adapted campus extended to first years, juniors and seniors. This decision gave the University a little less than two months to completely transform in-person social events and activities to an online format. 

In the period following the announcement, administrators and student leaders reimagined highly-attended programs like pre-orientation and the annual Extracurricular Bazaar to take place remotely. For example, outdoor experiences like the First-Year Outdoor Orientation Trips suddenly had to find a way to convert a backpacking and bonding experience into something that could happen over the internet.

Yale College Dean Marvin Chun told the News that his office had modified “almost every event” to comply with COVID-19 requirements and thanked the staff and students who helped for their “ingenuity and flexibility.”

“Most community-building activities [will] continue online, and many colleges have added programming to engage students during this challenging arrival quarantine period,” Chun said.

Long before coronavirus hit, Chun made improving residential college life one of his priorities as Dean. He told the News that this aspect of Yale will continue to be important, and that virtual meetings will allow students to remain close to one another — even while physically far apart. According to Chun, the work of the heads of colleges, deans, staff and student leaders will help maintain the residential colleges as a “central circle” for students.

Still, Head of Pauli Murray College Tina Lu told the News that her college will largely have to “play it by ear.” She said that they’re planning on taking advantage of their outdoor space and courtyard to maintain the residential college community, in addition to “experimenting with virtual spaces.”

According to Lu, large in-person events will have to wait until public health guidelines deem it appropriate and that they’re “still working it out.” But, she said, the vast majority of their students seem to sympathize with the college’s administration and understand that they’re doing their best to make the most of what they can feasibly accomplish. 

“I can’t wait to be able to throw another dance in real life, I can’t tell you how much I look forward to that,” Lu said. “But I also know that we can’t do that this year. We know that that’s just kind of a fact of our existence.”

Lu also said that she’s optimistic about the future of the residential colleges in the long-run. She noted that while this “is not the way” classes and residential college life should work, eventually they’ll both return. 

“I think it’s like acapella,” she said. “I’m not worried about the long-term future of acapella. People love acapella music, and it’s [going] to be back. The colleges will be back … Yale’s going to be Yale, it’s going to be fine in the long haul. I’m sure of that, but in the short haul, we’re going to have to make some accommodations  and cut some corners, because we all recognize that we have to keep one another in shape.”

According to YCC Events Director candidate Chloe Adda ’22 — who is running unopposed — she plans to  adhere to all necessary health guidelines when planning events for the year. She noted that this would likely mean all events will have to be virtual. 

Far from dismayed,  she told the News that maintaining Yale’s social events is “completely viable,” adding that  she encourages students to attend online events. Still, she acknowledged that virtual platforms are typically “awkward” at first. 

“I think the main challenge and focus of putting on such events lies in encouraging students to be open to socializing via Zoom and other video platforms,” Adda said. “I believe many of us still feel awkward over video-call applications such as Zoom given the sudden change from in-person to digital.”

EXTRA ANXIETY

(Yale News)

When Zoe Kanga ’24 first arrived at Yale, she was not allowed to be accompanied by her parents and was forced to stay in her room. During the 48 hours it took for her COVID-19 test results to be released, she told the News she felt “trapped” and “isolated.”

The News reached out to each of the first years running for a seat on the First-Year Class Council. The nine that responded, including Kanga, explained their transitions to Yale and expressed different views on how  Yale should incorporate first years into the student community. 

Kanga said that at first, her transition was “extremely difficult,”which sparked worry about the overall school year. Until now, she said, she hasn’t felt “like a true Yale student” since she hasn’t been able to leave college grounds. But she noted that the arrival quarantine helped strengthen her connection to her residential college and helped her get to know her peers. 

The eight other first years interviewed by the News all said they feel especially close to their peers in their residential colleges. But Adia Keene ’24 also said that there seems to be a “divide” between the first years and the rest of the student body, mostly due to the arrival quarantine.

Social divides are especially sharp for students who are enrolled remotely, many of whom have had to invest significant energy into making friends online. William An ’24 noted that he feels connected to the Yale community through his classes, participating in FOOT and a groupchat made specifically for remote students. Still, he noted that he is had some “unique challenges” as a remotely enrolled first year and that transitioning to Yale had “not been a walk in the park by any means.”  

Lu also noted that because of the arrival quarantine, she feels that the first years have been able to “really get to know each other.” She added that they seem to be spending a lot of time with each other online, outdoors and while social-distancing. Still, she said that the quarantine was “definitely a really, really big fact in all of [their] lives.”

“The transition has gone as well as expected, and some first years actually feel as though the transition was helped by the two-week quarantine,” said Grayson Phillips ’24. “…The start of college was primarily centered on the residential college and meeting your classmates. People that would otherwise have gone four years without having a meaningful conversation now have real connections, which was only possible because we were stuck inside together. While colleges are tight, it’s been hard to feel like a part of Yale itself at times, because without classes or the freedom to roam it doesn’t really feel like you’re a part of something bigger.”

First-year counselors, the friendly faces during the opening days of orientation, have worked to create a strong community around the residential college — where most first years spent two weeks upon arrival.

Unlike in years past, all first-year counselors held meetings with their students virtually. Grace Hopper First-Year Counselor Abdah Adam ’21 said that although it was  at first frustrating to not see them in person, her group ultimately became very comfortable with each other. 

According to Timothy Dwight first-year counselor Nishanth Krishnan ’21, there is a “collective effort” to help first years find their place at Yale, but everyone is aware that the public health guidelines create new restrictions and a “new reality” for Yalies. For example, he noted that many of the places where people typically meet other Yale students are “far less available for making meaningful connections,” like in class or in student organizations.

Several of the first years who spoke to the News said that Yale should attempt to host responsible, in-person social events as much as possible. Phillips said that he recognizes that in-person events would exclude remotely-enrolled students. The University should work to accommodate remote students and prepare students for a completely virtual semester should they be required to go home early, he said. 

Still, the large number of virtual interactions has “[taken] a toll” on students, Phillips added. An overreliance on Zoom, he said, would encourage students to attend unofficial and unsafe events. 

I think that it’s extremely important that we still have a non-virtual social life while on campus,” Kanga said. “If it gets to a point that we are only interacting with people online, there is no difference between us being on campus or being remote. We all chose to take the risk by coming here, and I think that we should still have modified versions of existing traditions.”

“If it gets to a point that we are only interacting with people online, there is no difference between us being on campus or being remote. We all chose to take the risk by coming here, and I think that we should still have modified versions of existing traditions.”

—Zoe Kanga ’24

DISCONNECTED, BUT CONNECTED

But while first years adjust to life on campus, sophomores — the only class barred from campus for the fall semester — are establishing homes beyond Yale. 

Luka Silva ’23 said he was at first “shocked” and “mad” upon hearing Yale’s decision. Now, he recognizes why administrators made that choice, even if he’s not “sure [if he] really agrees with their decision.” 

Silva — who’s enrolled remotely from home — told the News that since everything is online, it’s easier for him to stay connected to his friends and student groups at school, despite his initial fears. He added that it’s easier since everything at Yale is online — if he were forced to be virtual while there were in-person or hybrid activities, he would feel much more “severed” from the Yale community.

I do think it’s been tough to connect to classmates in zoom classes though; in person you can talk to your neighbors and make little comments  and stuff while the class is going on or when you’re walking in/out,” Silva said. “I think virtual definitely just makes making new friends tougher, but works fairly well with allowing me to stay connected to the friends I already have.”

Isabella Huang ’24, a Production & Design staffer for the News, said that she chose to take a leave of absence since she didn’t see the value in paying tuition for online classes, in addition to not wanting to “miss out” on typical campus life.  

She added that because most of her friends are also not in New Haven, she still feels connected to Yale’s community. Since most of her extracurricular activities have continued to happen online, she said that she’s still able to feel involved.

“I don’t think I’m missing out on too much if I’m joining the same Zoom sessions from home,” she said.

While the sophomore class is slated to return to campus for the spring semester, first years must return home and complete the academic year remotely. Chun explained that the decision about class restrictions for first years and sophomores, although difficult, was necessary — since all students needed a single bedroom, the campus would not be able to house both classes at one.

To that end, deans and residential college heads had to redo every housing assignment, making it imperative that students decide weeks before term whether they would live in the dorms. Only after administrators knew who planned to return in the first place could they assign first year students to their residential colleges.

“I regret that we are unable to house sophomores in the fall and first years in the spring,” he said. “However, reducing the density of housing was an essential requirement to bring students back to campus … Every step got delayed in a cascade. I’m grateful for the students’ patience and understanding.”

Also unique to this year is the unusual amount of students living off-campus compared to years past. Yale Director of Media Relations Karen Peart told the News last week that only 36 percent of on-campus housing capacity is filled, meaning that the number of students living off-campus has increased by 79 percent. 

Ashley Dreyer ’22 told the News that she chose to live off-campus because it allowed her to live with her close friends while still seeing other people via socially-distanced get-togethers. 

For Siddarth Shankar ’22, living off-campus seemed like the safer and more affordable option. He added that while living on-campus would have given him less control over communal spaces and food options, he’s now able to choose who he interacts with. 

I still feel connected to the Yale community, but the community looks and feels different than it did in the past,” he said. “The lack of extracurricular involvement and activities this semester is definitely something that I am missing a little bit. I rarely venture onto campus except for my twice-weekly testing appointments and I’ll still remain wary of being in such close proximity to many other students as facilities begin to open up.”

YCC Vice-Presidential candidate Matthew Murillo ’22 said he was “grateful” that he could afford to live off-campus with the room and board refund Yale provides students receiving financial aid. Still, he noted that some of his peers on financial aid found it difficult to secure off-campus housing. 

ILLICIT ACTIVITIES

For much of the summer, administrators feared what many students love: large gatherings — now in violation of both the community compact and public health guidelines. Recently, several colleges around the country — like the University of North Carolina and the University of Notre Dame — have transitioned to online classes after reopening for the fall due to COVID-19 outbreaks stemming from large parties.

Three first years and two juniors who requested anonymity for fear of punishment told the News that they had recently been to a party, in suites and off-campus spaces respectively. Although the parties were less than 10 people in each case, the events still violated Yale’s 14-day arrival quarantine. 

“It’s just hard after not seeing people for so long not to socialize in groups,” one of the first-years said. “What did Yale expect to happen?”

Phillips said that while he doesn’t condone suite parties, he thinks “some willful neglect from the administration” could be beneficial, to a certain extent.

“Groups technically breaking Yale guidelines regarding suite guests but remaining relatively small [around 10] present a lesser risk to the safety of the community,” he wrote in an email to the News, “and by allowing kids to ‘get away with partying’ in a lower risk manner, the administration can avoid large-scale gatherings replete with the sharing of bottles and other activities with high risks of transmission.”

An told the News that many students chose to enroll remotely because they were worried about students not following through with the regulations. The administration should take suite parties and similar matters seriously, he added. Kenan Collignon ’24 similarly said that if students do not heed warnings by administration, “strict” and “immediate” action should follow.

Shankar said violating the regulations is “disrespectful” to the Yale and New Haven community, since doing so would detract from the progress the city and the state has made in curtailing the virus’s spread. He noted that many Yale students are from populations that the pandemic has not disproportionately affected, and that it’s likely many of them don’t know anyone who’s been impacted by COVID-19. 

“Partying under these circumstances is not just a simple misunderstanding or a mistake. It is a deliberate action taken with malintent.”

—Siddarth Shankar ’22

“People downplay the severity of this disease and they continue to believe that life can continue as normal,” Shankar said. “Moreover, people think that their individual actions don’t make a difference — they think if everyone is breaking social distancing, then why does it matter if I do as well? Partying under these circumstances is not just a simple misunderstanding or a mistake. It is a deliberate action taken with malintent.”

According to a Yale site detailing the enforcement of the community compact, students found not in compliance will first answer to one of Yale College’s Health and Safety Leaders: Dean of Student Affairs Melanie Boyd or Senior Director of the Faculty of Arts and Sciences Cathy Velucci. Repeated or serious violations will be handled by the Compact Review Committee, which may result in administrative action like restricted access to campus spaces or more serious disciplinary action. 

The site also notes that such consequences may be dealt with without the CRC, if violations are found through data capturing methods — like not filling out Yale’s daily health check while on campus. In an email to the News, Chun said that after the arrival quarantine, suite gatherings of 10 people are allowed if everyone wears a mask and stays six feet apart. Still, he noted that since on-campus gatherings are limited to one guest per suite resident, the majority of these events will have to be fewer than 10.

“All enrolled students have agreed to abide by the community compact, so I expect that they will support and protect each other by avoiding risky gatherings,” he said.

But Keene ’24 said that conversations with friends have shown just how unclear many students find the rules — including limits on personnel and visits to other residential colleges. 

She added that moving forward, clarifying these rules is “essential” for Yale.

“If the administration wants to effectively enforce rules, they have to make sure everyone knows them well,” Keene said.

Kanga said that it should be “the responsibility of the individual or group” to realize the consequences and risks of their actions, and that the administration shouldn’t directly interfere due to “privacy concerns.” Leleda Beraki ’24 also told the News that such illicit activities are “more on the students” than the administration, who have provided students with the means to have a safe semester. 

Andrew Aguilar ’24 noted that there should be more an effort to “[cultivate] a culture of accountability,” both within friend groups and the wider Yale community. While Kanga said that students who do not choose to stop breaking guidelines should be “removed from campus immediately,” Aguilar said that he hopes there can be alternatives asides from this like returning to on-campus quarantine. 

“This is not our space, this is not a place for people to let loose and have fun, this is a city full of people who are endangered by our presence,” Beraki said. “This responsibility lies in the hands of every student. As cliche as it is, peer pressure works. If we all hold the same mentality that we want a safe year, then those who decide otherwise will feel isolated and follow suit. Being a part of the Yale community means thinking about the greater good and not ourselves, there is no better time than now to show how strong our campus truly is.”

CONTINUING BONDS

Despite the challenges of this semester, student groups are hoping to at least break even — maintaining old relationships and perhaps building new ones with first years.

Still, these efforts are not without challenges. Yale Dems Membership and Inclusion Coordinate Kennedy Bennett ’22 told the News that many of their group’s friendships develop in settings unavailable this semester. The issue, she said, is not exclusive to their group. For many clubs, little events like getting a meal together or going to Woads are quintessential Yale  experiences.

“It isn’t that our Zoom meetings are limited, but it’s the ‘something extra’ — like doing work together in a coffee shop or getting ready together for a Saturday night with a new friend — that’s missing.”

—Kennedy Bennett ’22

It isn’t that our Zoom meetings are limited, but it’s the ‘something extra’ — like doing work together in a coffee shop or getting ready together for a Saturday night with a new friend — that’s missing,” Bennett said. “We are working to compensate for these experiences by encouraging  members to participate in socially distant in-person activities…”

Still, she said that their group is “committed” to building a community and that they’ve added a mentorship initiative to add to their “social cohesion.” She added that they’ve also transitioned their social initiatives to online platforms.

Shankar — a member of Yale Jashan Bhangra — said that the team plans on allowing anyone to join instead of holding auditions online. He added that they’re considering hosting workouts and dance lessons over Zoom during the semester. While he said it’s not the same as in years past, their “strong, tight-knit” community will help maintain their bonds.

“We have learned and are continuing to learn how to build and sustain relationships in a largely virtual landscape,” YCC Presidential candidate Abey Philip ’22 said. “We are forced to carefully decide who we hang out with, how often we hang out with them, and how much time we invest in them. Through these past months, we have made time for each other, and we have found new and engaging ways to still connect with one another. This will be a challenge. But we will come out stronger on the other side.”

Phillip echoed that although Yale’s student body faces “immense challenges” this semester regarding maintaining its community, he believes that students have risen to the occasion.

Collignon said that since students will continue to want to socialize, it should be done in a safe manner, like through movie nights or small-scale sports. Ava Saylor ’24 and Andrew Du ’24 expressed similar sentiments, giving the examples of a water balloon fight or scavenger hunt respectively.

Yale’s administration also believes in the ability of campus student groups to maintain their respective communities — whether their members are in New Haven or elsewhere in the world.

“Because so many students are participating remotely, we ask that student organizations conduct their activities virtually,” Chun said. “We want all students to feel connected with each other and with campus life.”

(Yale News)

Credits

Powered by

UP CLOSE:
Athletic recruiting in the year without sports

Published on September 16, 2020

Every head turned toward Director of Athletics Vicky Chun as she advanced across Reese Stadium on March 11 toward Andy Shay, the Yale men’s lacrosse head coach. It was a clear, mild afternoon in the stadium, and attackman Matt Brandau ’23 stood beside a teammate, exchanging nervous glances.

Five minutes later, Chun and Shay emerged from a team room underneath the bleachers.

“I can’t really describe the feeling in the huddle when he said, ‘It’s over, we’re done,’ other than there was a mix of tears right away — guys throwing gloves; some guys were angry,” Brandau said. “Athletic Director Chun tried to console us, but I think everyone was so glazed over that we weren’t really absorbing her words.”

Most spring Ivy League student-athletes say that it is easy to remember exactly where they were and what they were doing when they received the news that was released at 3 p.m. on March 11, 2020. That news, of course, marked the end of Ancient Eight spring athletics. In July, the League terminated all intercollegiate athletic competition sports until at least the 2021 calendar year.

Now, the athletic community has just begun to grasp the real possibility of the COVID-19 pandemic affecting college athletics far beyond the spring of 2020.

From lacrosse to basketball to fencing, collegiate sports recruiting is entering a whole new landscape. Over the years, the athletic community had settled on a comfortable recruiting timeline: scouting, visits, checks with admissions, commitment, application and acceptance. But with a deadly virus in the picture, this is no longer sustainable. 

“I can’t really describe the feeling in the huddle when he said, “It’s over, we’re done,” other than there was a mix of tears right away — guys throwing gloves; some guys were angry, Athletic Director Chun tried to console us, but I think everyone was so glazed over that we weren’t really absorbing her words.”

—Matt Brandau ’23, men's lacrosse attackman

THE DEAD PERIOD

Shortly after the cancellation of the spring athletic season, the NCAA introduced another drastic change when it implemented a recruiting “dead period” — a prescribed duration of time during which no in-person recruiting is allowed. The Division I Council Coordination Committee placed this immediate ban on March 13, and the Council has met virtually to extend the dead period multiple times since then. Currently, there is no in-person recruiting allowed through Sept. 30. According to Maia Dreyer, the founder of Three 4 Three — a consulting agency for high school athletes looking to get recruited in college — the dead period will most likely continue to be extended through the end of this calendar year.

While virtual recruiting  — such as Zoom meetings or phone calls — can still take place, this extension changes the game for prospective athletes and coaches.

“My 2021 high school kids, what they have had to do is visit college campuses but not meet with the coaches in person, and they do not get to meet the team,” Dreyer said. “Three of my juniors have committed to schools without being face-to-face with the coaches … So, there are ways to do it, and it is being done, it’s just not ideal.”

On the other end of recruiting conversations, coaches are also attempting to make the process as seamless as possible despite major setbacks.

With the dead period in place, the lack of in-person visits has been a major source of frustration for Steve Gladstone, the Yale heavyweight crew team head coach.

“The critical piece is that [recruits] get a sense of what it would be like to be a student at Yale and an oarsman, of course,” Gladstone said. “I think one of our significant advantages is the energy of our squad. Anybody that comes down on a recruiting visit and watches one of our practices, it’s going to mark them. We can have lots of discussions and Zoom calls and so on, but for them to actually have a palpable sense or feel for our squad is eliminated.”

Gladstone said he relies heavily on his crew to provide feedback on prospective athletes, given that the presentation recruits put on in front of coaches disappears when interacting with the team. Interaction with current squad members, which helps determine which prospective athletes might get a spot, is now gone.

Claudia Chang, a swim recruit for the class of 2025, managed to narrowly escape this problem –– she visited and committed to Yale shortly before the dead period was implemented.

“I feel very fortunate that I was able to make my decision and be on campus before this whole pandemic,” Chang said. “Seeing how the team works and the team environment was super important to me. I had some friends who didn’t get a chance to visit before COVID. They have visited campus and gotten the chance to meet with a few swimmers, but I think they are definitely disappointed that they didn’t get a chance to go on an official and meet the whole team.”

“Anybody that comes down on a recruiting visit and watches one of our practices, it’s going to mark them. We can have lots of discussions and Zoom calls and so on, but for them to actually have a palpable sense or feel for our squad is eliminated.”

—Steve Gladstone, head coach of the Yale heavyweight crew team

A LACK OF VISIBILITY

In addition to the ban on in-person visits, the disappearance of high school sporting events across the country also makes the recruiting process more difficult. 

Student-athletes who participate in sports such as track, swimming and rowing often rely on personal records or times to secure support from a coach. Without the opportunity to achieve those goals, getting recruited is challenging. Similarly, without games or matches, athletes have fewer opportunities to showcase their skills — they may have a shorter highlight reel or worse statistics to present to a recruiter.

For a swimmer like Alex Deng, who committed to Yale for the class of 2025 in August, the lack of swim meets abruptly halted his recruiting journey last March. Without the opportunity to record personal bests, it was difficult for the prospective student-athlete to demonstrate that he deserved a spot at Yale.

“Everything was running pretty smoothly up until COVID hit, and that’s when things started really slowing down for me because there were no meets, all swimming was at a halt and coaches had to focus on their own swimmers,” Deng said. “It went kind of 100 to zero pretty quick for me … I was very anxious about it.”

As the future of both high school and college athletics is unclear, coaches said they are forced to rely on old results or videos. Selecting athletes becomes much more of a gamble.

Geographic disparities also present an unforeseen complication in recruitment. As states make their own decisions on whether to allow athletic events, high school athletes from high-risk areas are faced with an additional burden. 

The Minnesota Department of Health allowed athletic activities to resume on June 24 for outdoor sports and June 1 for indoor sports. On the other hand, the California Interscholastic Federation announced on July 20 that the start of the high school sports season will be delayed until December or January. 

Chang noted this disparity in opportunities for athletes in various states and said it could affect coaches’ ability to assess one’s performance — especially for sports that tend to recruit later, such as swimming.

“I definitely think it’s a hard situation because every state is so different, so some swimmers have had the opportunities to swim at meets and get their best times and others haven’t,” Chang said. “I think it could definitely help some swimmers and hurt others, but hopefully the college coaches would be able to do a pretty good job of using their experience to predict how an athlete will do in college.”

ACADEMIC TESTING CHANGES

As colleges adapt their general admissions procedures to the ongoing pandemic, prospective student-athletes are also forced to navigate an environment with changing academic requirements.

Due to potential COVID exposure during ACT and SAT testing, the NCAA and the Ivy League have both relieved student-athletes of  the requirement for a standardized testing score. All Ivy League institutions have also released individual statements that they do not require any student, athlete or not, to submit a standardized testing score. 

Like all applicants, prospective student-athletes are encouraged, but not required to submit the results of any standardized tests they have taken to date,” the Ivy League announced on its website. “Full consideration will be given to all applicants, regardless of whether they have the opportunity to take a standardized test.”

Though Chang achieved a high enough score on her standardized test before COVID struck, her peers have experienced trouble when scheduling tests. She added that the fact that many college applications are test-optional does not change much, given that many of her peers are still planning on somehow finding a time and place to take it. 

Dreyer also reasoned why many high school athletes are still trying to secure a score.

“A lot of kids didn’t have the score they needed … but a great score could definitely tip the scales in your favor and help if your transcript wasn’t super strong,” Dreyer said.

EFFECTS ON VARSITY PROGRAMS

On top of challenges with recruitment, the number of incoming first-year athletes taking gap years makes the future of Yale athletics more unpredictable. 

Historically, when a first-year student-athlete takes a gap year, they end up stripping an unsuspecting potential recruit of a spot. Every varsity program at Yale has a limited number of spots for recruits in a given class.

Jack Stuzin ’24, a defenseman for the Yale men’s lacrosse team, told the News that he decided against a gap year partly for this reason. 

“I was close to taking a gap year,” Stuzin said. “But I didn’t want to put anybody in the position in the grade below me where I was taking up a recruiting spot because I know if I were in that situation I would be pretty bummed about it.”

Despite the recruiting policy, Stuzin said his coaches and athletics staff did not encourage or discourage him to take a gap year. Both Gladstone and head volleyball coach Erin Appleman said they feel that the decision to take time away from Yale is a personal one.

When asked about this policy, the Yale Athletics Compliance Office deferred responsibility for admissions decisions of student-athletes to the Admissions Office. The Compliance Office is comprised of two staff members, Jason Strong and Katie Tortorici, who help Yale athletic affiliates adhere to NCAA, Ivy League and Yale rules.

The athletic department works closely with the Office of Admission each year regarding its support of prospective student-athletes,” a representative from the Compliance Office wrote in an email to the News. “All admissions decisions reside within the Office of Admission.”

The Compliance Office also added that Yale does not require first years, including student-athletes, to reapply for admissions even if they are taking a gap year. 

Though Gladstone was under the impression that first years taking the year off would result in fewer recruiting spots for the collegiate class of 2025, both Gladstone and Dreyer emphasized that change is always imminent and nothing is certain.

“I think at this time with all things, they’re in flux. And it’s not because people are incompetent in the leadership positions, but there are so many moving parts that they can’t give us an exact figure.”

—Steve Gladstone, head coach of the Yale heavyweight crew team

“I think at this time with all things, they’re in flux,” Gladstone said. “And it’s not because people are incompetent in the leadership positions, but there are so many moving parts that they can’t give us an exact figure.”

Dreyer added that each school and conference is different, and the NCAA has been making unprecedented changes to adapt to the ongoing pandemic.

When the News inquired about student-athletes’ plans, the Yale athletic department declined to comment on individual students’ decisions.

“We cannot comment on student-athletes’ decisions on leaves or deferrals and the numbers that have or have not done so due to several HIPPA and NCAA standards,” Associate Athletic Director Mike Gambardella said in an email to the News.

With athletes taking time off, team size will also likely change, potentially resulting in drastic roster imbalances. Gladstone predicted that his team will grow in the coming years. But in three years, depending on how many of his incoming first-years take time off, he said he might have a smaller senior class.

Gladstone also expects bigger schools to have an enormous advantage over the Ivies if there were to be a competitive season this spring.

Many rowers at other Ivy Leagues, such as Harvard, are following the trend and taking time off, according to Gladstone. Because there will be fewer rowers on both teams, the playing field might be more level with the rival Crimson than with the likes of the University of Washington and the University of California, Berkeley — two strong heavyweight rowing competitors.

While Yale’s Athletic Department did not comment on how students taking a leave of absence might affect team size, Princeton’s Director of Athletics Mollie Marcoux Samaan said that her department is working with its admission office to manage roster sizes and support opportunities for recruits.

“Maintaining manageable roster sizes in each class year is always very important, as we are focused on providing a highly meaningful experience for all of our student-athletes,” Marcoux Samaan wrote in an email to the News. “As our coaches have navigated the current challenges, I am proud of how they have continuously put the individual needs of each student-athlete front and center.”

Moreover, the future of these recruits rely on collegiate athletes’ plans to either defer or enroll because some specialty positions are only recruited every other year. When a talented player takes a leave of absence, they will likely be encouraged to utilize their year of extra eligibility. But this also means that this position will not be needed on the team for at least another season.

One of Dreyer’s clients is a volleyball setter in the high school class of 2022. Under normal circumstances, a volleyball coach would recruit a setter every two years. However, since a current setter may have the option to stay another year, that position may no longer be needed for the college class of 2026.

“It’s important to know if they need one or not, and [the recruit] is kind of in a tough situation because they don’t know,” Dreyer said. “Are they going to need my position, or are they going to keep a senior an extra year that’s my position and not need me?”

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

The athletics community at large remains unsure of what the next few months, possibly years, hold.

Still, although the future remains speculative, the head coach of the Yale volleyball team, Erin Appleman, said she is focused on the situation at hand.

“There are student-athletes on campus, there are student-athletes in New Haven, there are student-athletes at home, there are student-athletes that are taking a leave of absence, and it’s honestly getting a little confusing to keep track of what category everyone is in.”

—Erin Appleman, head coach of the Yale volleyball team

“There are student-athletes on campus, there are student-athletes in New Haven, there are student-athletes at home, there are student-athletes that are taking a leave of absence, and it’s honestly getting a little confusing to keep track of what category everyone is in,” Appleman said. “We don’t really know everything about admissions at this point in time. We’re excited about starting whatever part of the season we can start.”

Many athletes interviewed by the News also remain optimistic. Stuzin, a first-year on the men’s lacrosse team, acknowledged his coaches and upperclassmen teammates’ efforts to keep things running smoothly and the team in shape.

“I think with us it’s always work hard really no matter who’s watching, and the older guys have done an unbelievable job of getting first-years acclimated,” Stuzin said. “Unbelievable job is an understatement. We’re not [in New Haven] right now, or at least some of us aren’t there right now, but they are making a team atmosphere … Once we are finally together it’s going to be a pretty seamless transition.”

For those who are enrolled in New Haven, the Ivy League has introduced a three-phased approach for return to play, which will progress depending on public health conditions. The plan begins with individual and small group workouts and will ramp up to larger group practices.

For now, coaches and athletes are waiting to see the outcome of phase one, which will commence following this week’s medical examinations of the student-athletes. Phase one is run by the strength and conditioning program, not by the sport’s individual head coaches.

Phase two and three will be rolled out as conditions permit.

“The policies and procedures put forth are designed to welcome our Bulldogs back to campus and put them in position to succeed while keeping health and safety at the forefront,” Athletic Director Vicky Chun wrote to the News. “There will be more challenges ahead but we will face them head on; just as we have done in the past.”

Chun also expressed gratitude for the Yale administration’s meticulous planning for return to campus and commitment to the wellbeing of Yale’s student-athletes.

For now, coaches will have to navigate the tricky, ever-changing recruiting landscape in order to prepare for the competitive seasons of the future.

“You don’t really know what’s happening with the scholarship schools, what’s happening around the conference,” Appleman said. “You just try and make good connections with prospective student-athletes … and see if they can find the same love as we all have for Yale University.”

(Yale Daily News)

UP CLOSE:
A curatorial evolution

At Yale’s art institutions, the COVID-19 pandemic has incited a wave of change in programming and how curators approach their work.

Published on September 15, 2020

Walking down Chapel Street is a different experience today. Quaint and bustling a mere seven months ago, the street now exudes a sense of slow resurgence with half-shuttered stores and delivery-only restaurants. For a moment, a ray of sunlight streaks across the Starbucks crosswalk, rendering edges of the intersection blurry. Things almost feel different. But then the haze lifts, revealing two buildings whose doors, typically open to the public, remain indefinitely shut: the Yale University Art Gallery and the Yale Center for British Art.

“The life of a museum is interacting with the public, and that has entirely been put on hold,” said Laurence Kanter, chief curator and the Lionel Goldfrank III Curator of European Art at the YUAG.

Responding to the global pandemic, the two institutions joined artistic institutions across the world by temporarily closing this March. But behind closed doors, work for curators is not decreasing.

According to Kanter, curators at the YUAG have continued to catalogue and maintain collections, communicate with lenders and assist Yale’s teaching faculty with course materials. The closure gave Keely Orgeman, the Seymour H. Knox, Jr., Associate Curator of Modern and Contemporary Art, time to engage with scholarship, develop curator-led online programming and reflect upon objects in the museum’s collections.

Closures also led to rapid programming changes. Despite the postponement of exhibitions, YUAG Director Stephanie Wiles said the museum continued to lay out a five-year strategic plan including renovation projects. Wiled added that current events regarding ongoing police violence against Black Americans have added urgency to the gallery’s commitments to diversity, inclusion and access.

To continue community engagement post-closures, institutions increased their online presence to bring resources to the general public. Christopher Renton, associate director of marketing and communications at the Peabody Museum of Natural History, said the pandemic caused staff to quickly “pivot” in order to create digital programming and keep their audiences engaged.

Yet the most onerous work for curators has been in their own minds. They must grapple with how museums can both adapt to the current public health crisis and prepare for a post-pandemic world.

THE DIGITAL EXHIBITION

The traditional gallery experience doesn’t necessarily prioritize pandemic protocols, especially in museums with large crowds and tight spaces. These practical concerns have forced museums to rethink how they engage with the public.

Immediate concerns for the physical museum include implementing provisions for social distancing, decreasing museum capacity, marking unidirectional pathways through gallery spaces, restricting usage of headsets and touchscreens, rethinking the logistics of artwork transport and considering future programming uncertainties.

But changes must also occur outside of a traditional in-person gallery experience. Wiles noted that all museums and cultural institutions recognize the need to continue building a digital presence by providing virtual access to exhibitions and collections.

The YUAG is working with the Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, YCBA and Peabody to improve cross-collection online searches. The Peabody has been hosting virtual gallery talks and lectures, and is preparing for their first large-scale virtual fiesta.

Agnete Lassen, associate curator of the Yale Babylonian Collection, said curators have been converting two exhibitions into digital experiences. She noted that curators must make different aesthetic considerations when organizing online exhibits. When creating physical exhibitions, it is important to consider colors, sizes and spatial relationships between objects — none of which translate well to digital mediums. Yet the virtual world offers novel opportunities with pop-up windows, video insertions of curator-led tours and options to embed longer blocks of text for interested readers.

“I think this is something that’s gonna stay for the long run,” Lassen said. “We don’t think of [online exhibitions] as static; rather, we keep creating new content that we can add. So there’s a lot of flexibility and so much potential that we still have to explore.”

This transition posed particular challenges for some of Yale’s artistic institutions. Kanter said that museums like the Metropolitan Museum of Art have always maintained a massive digital interface, while the Morgan Library and Museum and the Frick Collection shifted all public outreach to digital platforms. But he added that since the YUAG did not expend many resources on its virtual identity pre-pandemic, the shift to digital was a “major change.” Similarly, Renton said that since the Peabody had grown into a chiefly “in-person experience” over the years, switching to digital had been challenging.

We’re not going to do digital exhibitions — that’s besides the point. We strongly feel that our purpose is to offer the public the opportunity to encounter great works of art directly and personally.

—Laurence Kanter, chief curator at the YUAG

Yet while digital programming continues to provide new avenues, not all curators are open to digital exhibitions.

“We’re not going to do digital exhibitions — that’s besides the point,” Kanter said. “We strongly feel that our purpose is to offer the public the opportunity to encounter great works of art directly and personally.”

While Kanter agrees that digital access to art is better than no access, he said that anyone with access to art can disseminate it digitally. He believes a museum’s “highest goal” lies in its unique ability to grant direct physical access to the public.

The challenges museums must contend with extend beyond the digital realm. Highlighting the potential for the pandemic to manifest as a global financial crisis, Orgeman noted financial and budgetary constraints.

“Since we don’t know long-term financial impacts, we have to be more intentional and collaborative about our use of resources,” Orgeman said. “I think more museums will do what Yale’s doing — develop installations centered around existing collections. I don’t see blockbuster exhibitions returning for another few years.”

CRISIS AS OPPORTUNITY

(David Zheng)

In a time before COVID-19, museums across the world were already moving toward digital content, only at a slower pace. The current crisis has curators confronting challenges posed by the online format as occasions for innovation.

“Everyone hopes to use moments of crisis as learning opportunities,” Wiles said. “One thing we know is that when we look back at ourselves in two, three, or five years, we want to have used these lessons to help make the institution we work for a better and stronger place.”

Orgeman foresees greater engagement between contemporary artists and museums, either through online programs or commissioned collaborations.

“One of the things that has really become clear during the lockdown is everybody being forced to move online suddenly makes the world seem a lot smaller,” Lassen said. “I really feel like there’s been a lot of interaction in these academic communities that have come from the lockdown.”

Four months ago, the Yale Babylonian Collection, along with five core institutions — the Harvard Museum of the Ancient Near East, the Kelsey Museum of Archaeology, the Oriental Institute, the Penn Museum and the Metropolitan Museum of Art — co-founded “#ConnectingCollections.”

Elizabeth Knott, a postdoctoral associate at the Yale Babylonian Collection who spearheaded the initiative, said that #ConnectingCollections explores connections across museum collections focused on the ancient world. Using monthly thematic posts on Instagram and other social media platforms, the project exposes the work that lies behind exhibition planning, scholarly research, conservation efforts and storage practices. For instance, the Yale Babylonian Collection and Penn Museum shared and compared two tablets from the Epic of Gilgamesh that were written by the same scribe but wound up in separate collections.

The Getty, the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, and the Morgan Library and Museum have since joined the initiative. Lassen said the team reached out to museums in Iraq, Jordan and Turkey, and the Slemani Museum in Iraq recently agreed to collaborate. Lassen said since it was easy to invite curators from Europe or the Middle East to a Zoom meeting, it had been very fruitful to speak with curators across museums. She hopes this connection lasts beyond COVID-19.

“Improving digital connections is something museums had to learn anyway, but COVID-19 sort of gave us a head start in forcing us into it,” Lassen said. “It was something that sprang from necessity, but in many ways it’s really given us something that we were not expecting in terms of engagement with other museums and our curatorial colleagues, but also a much wider audience.”

On a similar note, Renton noted that it has been positive to see the Yale Peabody identity extend far beyond New Haven. He said in-person research talks usually had an audience of 60 to 80 people, but some of their online lectures were attended by over 300 people from around the world.

Kailen Rogers, assistant director of exhibitions at the Peabody, said that last fall, the museum attempted to digitize a diorama using a 3D digital scanning process called photogrammetry. During the pandemic, they extended this project and partnered with the Center for Collaborative Arts and Media to digitize all 11 of the museum’s dioramas for a research initiative called “Lens Reality.”

“This new way of looking at exhibitions is something we’re investing into at the CCAM,” said CCAM Director Dana Karwas. Karwas added she is excited to see how creative thinkers adapt to the “slower pace” the digital transition will bring. Instead of a mere tool to create art, she envisions digital components as more integrated frameworks for artistic design.

“There are some really exciting ways to think about all these arts disciplines — even though we have to put a pause on some parts, other avenues are opening up. I am excited about the shift, and about embracing it.”

There are some really exciting ways to think about all these arts disciplines — even though we have to put a pause on some parts, other avenues are opening up. I am excited about the shift, and about embracing it.

—CCAM Director Dana Karwas

THE ARTIST’S PERSPECTIVE

Sake parties, conferences in Asia and a new Instagram account are a few events characterizing Cynthia Rubin’s “pretty satisfying Zoom life.” Rubin, a new media artist based in New Haven, has embraced this time to try new things, change her practice and connect with other artists.

Marta Kuzma, dean of the Yale School of Art, said that as curators scrambled to revise their representation of artists, it empowered the individual artist to find their own way to present their work and curate projects. Kuzma sees artists responding to activism and forging platforms of public discussion.

“It’s a time for great creativity — the pandemic hasn’t really created any spare time,” Rubin said. “People are much more interested in genuinely looking at each other’s work.”

Finding success in visual art, like many other practices, often involves networking. Virtual platforms have not only made it easier to meet people, Rubin said, but the networking itself has shifted from simply establishing connections to exchanging ideas. Additionally, access to networks has increased transparency between artists and curators, making exhibition planning much easier.

Aki Sasamoto, assistant professor at the Yale School of Art, said that when the pandemic began, she considered expanding her art to video. But despite ample time to learn, she does not believe an artist can simply switch from their preferred medium.

Sasamoto views the current public demand for digital art as “momentary.” Surges in demand for particular art forms ebb and flow throughout history, and Sasamoto is confident the art world will regain equilibrium.

“This year, people are looking into how they can make art that is compatible with digital formats,” Sasamoto said. “I would imagine there will be a lot more artists who will come out of this, but that doesn’t mean other kinds of art have died.”

Neither Rubin nor Sasamoto foresee digital platforms fully replacing in-person experiences. Sasamoto said the relationship between the two mediums is not necessarily competitive. Instead, viewing art online inspires people to see the artwork at museums. “People want to hang out with people — it is tied to being human,” Sasamoto said.

THE ROLE OF MUSEUMS GOING FORWARD

(David Zheng)

Even as the immediate effects of the pandemic recede, curators have begun to engage with its more long-term implications. To many artists and curators, it seems as though several aspects of the museum experience will be forever altered.

For instance, Lassen noted that virtual exhibits introduce the ability to zoom into smaller objects and highlight different components of a work for interpretation.“Now when we build physical exhibits, if we don’t have that opportunity, it would feel like something’s missing,” Lassen said. She mentioned it would be possible to use virtual reality technology in physical museums to recreate this magnifying effect.

It’s possible that such constant adaptations have been the “norm” for museums. Kanter described museums as “constantly evolving.” He said that when museums were first conceived, they were exclusive to a small group of people. Since then, museums have expanded over time to include different variations of groups of people, becoming more academically and intellectually oriented. Kanter added that every generation has a different idea of what is best for a museum: Artistic preferences constantly change, and they’re changing today.

“Each period, people thought differently about what was important, and to a certain extent, it is the museum’s responsibility to respond to that and show people what they want to see,” Kanter said. “But it’s also a museum’s responsibility to educate the public and show them more than what they’re asking for. Otherwise, they’re like sports franchises or movie theaters — simply a commercial response to demand.”

But curators have varying ideas about the extent to which museums should control the narrative. According to Lassen, since digitizing collections allows anyone to access them, engagement with art has become a lot more “democratic.” She noted that in her area of expertise, ancient Near Eastern arts, curatorial practices have evolved from curators acting as “gatekeepers” of artifacts to providing open access to everyone.

Lassen thinks curators need to be open to letting other people question curatorial practices and letting other people tell their own stories.

Going forward, Lassen would like to solicit curatorial input from the community. She plans to invite community members to curate online exhibits by allowing them to choose objects of interest and write label texts.

The democratic nature of increased access to online collections contradicts the possibility that in-person access to museums will become even more exclusive amid health and safety concerns. Though large numbers of people across the globe can attend virtual museum events for free, Orgeman mentioned possibilities of selective in-person reopenings, ticketed sales and strict museum capacity limits.

“The future will be a very different reality, we don’t know what that will look like,” Kanter said. “Some days I fear it will be more commercial than less. Some days, I hope it will return to what it was meant to be — a philanthropic opportunity for the public.”

(Daniel Zhao)

Survey shows first years support social movements

Published on September 14, 2020

Throughout the summer, incoming Yalies marched.

One of those marchers was Ruhi Khan ’24, who demonstrated in May to support Black Lives Matter in her predominantly white hometown of Newark, Delaware. The march was peaceful, she said, and she was “moved” to see that many non-Black people like her — Khan is Indian — had come out in solidarity with the movement. During that procession, one of the onlooking police officers asked to take the microphone, Khan said, and in front of the crowd, he asked if attendees could keep it peaceful and safe; his daughter was marching.

Activism was a major topic of this year’s first-year survey, which was sent out by the News to learn more about the incoming Class of 2024. In March, Yale announced that it had admitted 2,304 students to the newest class of Yalies. But due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 341 students elected to take gap years as of Sept. 1, up from just 51 in the previous cycle. The anonymous survey — which was sent to 1,207 matriculating members of the Class of 2024 and accepted submissions between Aug. 31 and Sept. 2 — received 471 responses, for a response rate of 39 percent.

While the 471 students who responded to the survey answered questions about their residential colleges and their thoughts on Yale’s plan for the pandemic, many students also shared their opinion on politics.

Khan was not the only first-year student to march. Others in her class also took to the streets and to social media to stand against police brutality. And while several first years interviewed by the News have differing opinions on the numerous movements that made headlines over the summer — and continue to do so — one thing is clear: many members of the newest batch of Yalies, from Delaware to Utah to California, consider political and social activism to be a core concern.

ACTIVISM AT HOME

In Corpus Christi, Cynthia Sutanto ’24 attended two “strictly non-violent” Black Lives Matter rallies that focused on spreading awareness of police brutality. Additionally, the events provided a platform for Black artists to share their thoughts on the movement, Sutanto wrote in an email to the News.

“I chose to be a part of these rallies to stand in solidarity with members in my community who are affected by police brutality,” Sutanto wrote. “I believe these events are an important way to inform the general populace about racial inequality. The large amount of media attention that rallies/protests gained put pressure on lawmakers to make a change.”
Still, Sutanto noted that she perceives much of the current activism as performative, and hopes that activists will go beyond social media and into politics to advocate for change.

Jamarc Simon ’24 told the News that he “100 percent support[s] the Black Lives Matter movement,” saying that the country is moving in the right direction. While Simon added that he is “a little iffy” about the Defund the Police movement, he said that he supports better training for police officers and fully supports protests against police brutality.

From the survey results, most students have similar feelings.

Nearly three-quarters of first years who responded to the News’ survey, or 74 percent, were “very supportive” of the Black Lives Matter movement, while 17 percent were “somewhat supportive.” Respondents answered similarly when asked whether or not they supported protests against police brutality.

But distributions differed when students were asked if they supported the Defund the Police movement: just 34 percent were “very supportive,” while 11 percent and 12 percent of respondents were “somewhat unsupportive” and “not at all supportive,” respectively.

25.3 percent of first years who answered the survey said they had participated in a protest against police brutality this summer, and 49.9 percent said they weren’t able to attend a protest, “but wanted to.”

Even though Matthew Miller ’24 was not able to go to any protests for very long because he has family members who are at high risk for COVID-19, he told the News that he does wholeheartedly support Black Lives Matter and defunding the police.

“I do feel very strongly about the matter, being Black, so I want to be a part of the change,” Miller wrote in an email to the News. “The idea of defunding police was new to me but it makes so much sense — I’m also a very big mental health awareness advocate and often police do not properly respond to delicate mental health crises.”

Other students told the News about how sentiment for police reform has made its way past the sidewalks and streets and into their homes. For the first time, Mahesh Agarwal ’24’s immigrant parents are considering anti-Black racism, and Agarwal himself has learned about “nitty gritty issues” such as broken-windows policing.

For Agarwal, critically examining law enforcement is a crucial method of reform.

“I love that we’re questioning a core aspect of society,” Agarwal wrote to the News. “Does our criminal justice system need to look exactly the way it does now or could we imagine a more effective system? I don’t like the idea of pitting people against each other or burning everything down. I see issues through a policy lens rather than an ideological one.”

Gabe Ransom ’24 told the News that while he already cheered on movements to reform the police, the shooting last week of a teenager with autism near his home in Utah brought the issue closer to home.

“It was especially powerful for it to happen right next to my house, because most of the incidents that everyone talks about are Atlanta, Minneapolis, Ferguson, places that are not close to me,” Ransom said. “It always sets in a little bit more when it’s your community.”

Students protest the Yale Police Department following the shooting of Stephanie Washington and Paul Witherspoon in April 2019 (Ann Hui Ching)

POLITICAL LEANINGS

Similar to past years, the incoming class skews heavily liberal, with 32 percent and 46 percent of respondents saying that they were “very liberal” and “somewhat liberal,” respectively. Very few students identify on the other side of the political spectrum, with just 7.9 percent and 1.3 percent of respondents calling themselves “somewhat conservative” or “very conservative,” respectively.

Opinions on social acceptance based on political leanings also varied. A far greater proportion of liberal-leaning respondents answered “yes” when asked if they thought their political views would be accepted on campus, whereas the majority of conservative-leaning students answered either “no” or “unsure.”

These results line up with Suanto’s impression of the political landscape among first-year Yalies, based on the interactions she’s had during her first two weeks on campus. While most of her peers lean left, she said, she has also made friends with students whose views lean centrist or right. And while her left-leaning peers tend to be very vocal about their beliefs, the more center- or right-leaning students have been less so.

“These students tend to not broadcast their opinions because they fear being ‘canceled’ by other Yalies,” Sutanto wrote. “I believe this trend is problematic because it stifles the potential for productive political discourse. In order to actually change the minds of students (who are ultimately the future of this country), there needs to be a willingness to and acceptance of listening to a wide range of opinions.”

For Simon, Yale’s political environment is a welcome change — his high school community, he said, did not generally hold the views that he does. The “good thing” about Yale, Simon said, is that it seems like a safe space to voice one’s opinion, and he does not think that “people will condemn you for your political views.” Still, he said that he is biased in this particular case, because the overall campus political tone matches his own.

Han Choi ’24 shared a view similar to Sutanto and Simon.

“I think we can all agree that the Yale student body is definitely super liberal and left-leaning,” Choi said. “To me and to other students … just meeting people in my res college, I’m starting to see that there’s a lot more people with differing views, like not that far to the left, but I actually think that most people would be accepting of views even on the other end of the political spectrum.”

EVEN WITH ONLINE CLASSES, STUDENTS COMMIT TO ACTIVISM

Before Choi came to Yale, he joined a police reform advocacy group in his hometown of South Pasadena near Los Angeles. While his local police department did not grapple heavily with the issues criticized within the Los Angeles Police Department, Choi said, he and his group looked into the police handbook and looked for ways to increase transparency and accountability.

Even though Choi’s activism took place in his hometown, survey results indicate that almost half of first-year students — 46 percent — plan to engage in activism while at Yale. And while 36 percent of students are unsure of their plans, only about 18 percent said that their time at Yale will not include activism.

Multiple students interviewed by the News said that while activism at Yale did not play a major role in their decisions to matriculate, they appreciate what they perceive as the University’s broader culture of advocacy. For Sutanto, her interests lay in the Yale Undergraduate Prison Project and the Yale Prison Education Initiative, both projects run through Dwight Hall and both address issues she cares about.

“While activism did not specifically influence my decision to come to Yale, I did love the sense of community that Yale has,” Sutanto wrote. “Yalies are almost always willing to go the extra mile to support one another and their New Haven community. In the face of great racial inequality and a pandemic, Yale students make a point to not be complicit.”

Yale students express support for prison abolition in 2018 (Courtesy of Eli Feasley)

Miller echoed Sutanta, saying that student activism and the general passion for social movements has influenced him. While activism will not be his main focus while at Yale, Miller said, there remain issues that he wishes to fight for.

“I do plan to participate in political activism, much to the chagrin of my mother who told me that when I get to school, I just need to ‘keep [my] head down and do [my] work,’” Miller wrote. “I don’t think I would have ever considered myself an activist until I saw the change other Yalies were trying to create and realizing I could participate as well.”

Students from the Class of 2024 come from all 50 states, in addition to Washington, D.C. and Puerto Rico, and 72 countries.

UP CLOSE:
Transforming interpretation at Yale New Haven Hospital

As the pandemic rages on, the hospital's language services department is continuing along a path away from in-person interpretation.

Published on

The changes to Yale New Haven Hospital’s interpretation services, used by thousands of local residents each year, came suddenly in October of 2019.

That month, the hospital system’s Department of Patient Experiences and Operations implemented a series of critical changes to internal policy on interpretation services. The hospital reduced the types of patient-provider interactions that qualified for in-person interpretation services. Remote interpretation services such as video and phone interpretation grew in use. 

The policy switch and the fast timeline of its implementation sparked concern and confusion among many and started conversations between providers and administrators within the hospital. Some providers and employees questioned the sensitive types of patient-provider interactions where remote interpretation was being used. 

Yet the conversation over the changes halted almost as abruptly as they started. In the waning days of March, as the daily temperatures began to jump above freezing, the coronavirus pandemic arrived in New Haven with a feverish pitch, forcing all other issues to take a backseat.  

The public health crisis immediately demanded the absolute focus of Yale New Haven Hospital System, the city’s largest medical institution. All energies shifted quickly and completely to responding to the rates of infections that grew through April and May. The hospital transitioned numerous of its wings to serve the steady stream of COVID-19-positive patients and eliminated the many elective surgeries and traditional appointments that would usually fill up the hospital with in-person visits. 

“With the pandemic, resources were allocated elsewhere,” said Dr. Stephanie Massaro, an attending physician for hematology and oncology at Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital and also assistant professor of clinical pediatrics. “This issue had to be tabled because [the] administration needed to respond to other faculties to assure the provider and patient safety, and I understand that.” 

Yet as attention shifted focus, changes to the department of language services, which provides interpretation and translation services, have continued to show their effect. Access to in-person interpreters has become increasingly difficult, as the number of staff within the language services department has dropped. At the same time, the virtualization of health care through telehealth has normalized the expanded presence of remote interpretation services with some providers. Within the language services department, pushback to changes from numerous long-term employees has led to an exodus of staff. Inside the halls of many departments, a new normal — wherein remote services predominate over their traditional counterpart — has emerged.  

OCTOBER RESTRUCTURING

The October policy changes included new triage guidelines that reduced the number of types of appointment or patient-provider interactions that qualify for the use of in-person interpretation services. YNHH Chief Experience Officer Joan Kelly told the News in February that the decision to enact changes to the system formed part of an institutional effort to streamline and expand services.

The decision in December came after legal pressure to reconsider a part of its services for deaf and hard of hearing patients. In 2018, a federal judge ruled that a number of Connecticut hospitals, including Lawrence + Memorial Hospital of the YNHH system, were not in compliance with standards for providing interpretation services for deaf and hard of hearing customers.

But the changes left Limited English Proficiency (LEP) patients more dependent on remote forms of interpretation services. It predominantly increased the use of video interpretation, carried out on iPoles — portable carts with screens as heads used to display video interpreting services. The demand for iPoles led to their scarcity and raised questions about access to remote interpretation services, according to Massaro. Besides the problem of scarcity, providers also criticized the disruptive nature of the new video services, which they said dropped calls, due to issues in broadband connectivity.

YNHH spokesman Mark D’Antonio did not directly respond to questions about the hospital’s record of video-call connectivity or broadband access. Still, he praised the new policy in an email and said that administrators implemented the new program to allow “employees more autonomy in setting their schedules by identifying needs in advance.”  

But several current and former language services employees told the News that the lack of flexibility within the new operating system led to days where they sat idly — under-scheduled and underutilized. According to these employees, the new scheduling system regularly assigns interpreters only a limited amount of appointments each day. They added that it did not allow interpreters to reorganize their schedules or request different work when scheduled appointments cancelled. These employees also told the News that the changes have deflated morale and led to a split between management and numerous employees.

“What is the future for the department? Interpreters only by phone and video? Because I can’t see it any other way.”

“What is the future for the department? Interpreters only by phone and video? Because I can’t see it any other way,” a current employee of language services told the News. The employee asked their name be kept private for fear of retaliation from their employer.

YNHH did not respond directly to questions on the effect of the operating system changes to the work experience of employees. 

Patients too immediately noticed the change. In February, News interviews with New Haven residents that required use of language services revealed that the use of remote interpretation services occasionally led to suboptimal experiences for patients. 

One patient, Deli Velazquez, who originally hails from Mexico, told the News in February that she had trouble communicating through phone interpretation over multiple days when she went to the hospital to care for her ailing son in January. During that meeting, Velazquez struggled to communicate on behalf of her son, who was occasionally in too much pain to speak for himself. 

Velzaquez said she found the interpretation phone service unintelligible and asked instead for an in-person interpreter, but was told that none were available.

For the next three days, Velazquez relied on the phone interpretation services despite no improvements in quality. She continued to voice her concerns over the service and was later assigned an in-person interpreter, but only at certain hours. She told the News that the concerns over interpretation contributed to her overall confusion over treatment options. That confusion and distress over her son’s health led her to eventually discharge her son from the hospital and opt to take care of him at home.

Several patients who spoke to the News in February, including Velazquez, characterized their interactions with remote interpretation services to be a drop in quality from their past experiences with in-person interpretation services. They struggled to hear the interpreter and the remote interpreter failed to fully convey their concerns to the doctors, those patients explained.

Still, in February, Kelly told the News that negative experiences with early patient experiences with the remote services did not indicate a change in quality. Instead, these complaints were symptoms of adjusting to a change, she argued. 

The pandemic has brought an even larger amount of LEP patients in contact with virtual interpretation services. Since the onset of the pandemic, the hospital has only used remote interpretation services, often in the form of video, to communicate with COVID-19-positive patients. 

One such patient, Wanda Roman, a New Haven resident originally from Puerto Rico, was admitted to YNHH as COVID-19-positive in April. During her week stay at the hospital, Roman interacted with providers exclusively using video interpretation services. While Roman felt that she understood everything her providers shared with her, she told the News she felt less confident asking for information on the status of her health and treatment beyond what she was told. When the screen on the iPole went off, Roman felt that her time to ask questions was over. In the past, Roman said she asked passing interpreters for help.

The city’s ever-growing Latino community, with a high percentage of foreign-born Latin American immigrants from Mexico, Guatemala, Ecuador, among others, have settled in large numbers throughout the Greater New Haven area and account for about a third of the total population today. 

Spanish has remained the most prevalent language of request at YNHH accounting for 80 percent of the annual requests for language services in 2016. 

STRIKING A BALANCE

Experts continue to disagree over the extent to which newer remote interpretation services should be used in the medical interpreting industry.

The shift towards an increased use in remote services is not unique to the Yale New Haven Hospital. As the demand for interpretation services increased throughout the United States, health care providers had to find methods to fulfill the ever growing and linguistically diverse requests for interpretation services. 

Joumana de Santiago, manager of Interpretation Services for Lehigh Valley Health Network in Pennsylvania, told the News that while a shift towards remote services has often appealed to hospitals looking to modernize, it has sometimes caused difficulties. 

According to de Santiago, for smaller hospitals with limited resources, using remote interpretation services can often be the most economically feasible manner to provide interpretation. Still, the lack of interpersonal interaction has convinced many providers and industry professionals that there are aspects of in-person interpretation that cannot be replaced by remote interpreter services, she added.

Jacqueline Ortiz, director of Diversity and Inclusion for ChristianaCare, a Delaware-based health care provider, said that while the foundational role of a medical interpreter is as a “conduit” of language, interpreters also have ethical and professional obligations to serve as clarifiers, mediators and advocates.

Ortiz added that in-person interpretation services provide the most conducive environment for an interpreter to manage all these roles successfully. She explained that in-person interpreters can be more effective readers of body language, silence and other forms of non-verbal communication. This makes them more likely to spot situations where lapses in communication are not verbally communicated by patients. She added that this is particularly important in overcoming differences in cultural norms or the intimidating nature of a hospital environment.

“The interpreter is the only person in the room that knows when a service is not being provided when it should,” Ortiz said. “It’s not that patients always know what to do. Sometimes they’re just stuck.” 

“The interpreter is the only person in the room that knows when a service is not being provided when it should. It’s not that patients always know what to do. Sometimes they’re just stuck.”

—Jacqueline Ortiz, director of Diversity and Inclusion for ChristianaCare

INTERNAL DISSENT

Despite the turmoil of the COVID-19 pandemic, the hospital’s language services department has continued its transformation. 

Since October, the number of employees within the department has shrunk by nearly half; former staff interpreters and translators have left, reducing the number of employees from 34 in October of 2019 to around 20, former and current employees of the department confirmed to the News. 

Many of those that left did so because of the change, according to employees sourced by the News. Some resigned, others took early retirements. A few refused to return to work and were dismissed.

News interviews with nine former and current employees revealed that many of those exits were caused by a work environment cited as hostile and inconsiderate. Many of those who left the department had worked in it for nearly a decade. 

“Someone has left the department during each month this year,” said a current language services employee on the exodus of colleagues during which the department has seen many months with multiple employee resignations. 

The employee requested anonymity to discuss the happenings candidly with the News. 

Several of the former employees told the News they left the department because they felt the department had undergone a transformation with little to no input from department employees or providers. Many felt that the department no longer valued them as a vital part of the healthcare team. 

“I don’t think [Patient Experience and Operations management] took into consideration the experience [and] the quality of the service I was providing,” said Aura Marina James, a former YNHH interpreter of 15 years. “Because there was never a discussion [regarding the changes].” 

James made the decision to retire early in March, citing hostile and inconsiderate responses from management on employee concerns over the changes. 

YNHH did not respond to questions on the quick turnover of department employees nor on the number of in-person interpreters and translators it planned to keep on staff. 

A CHANGE IN FOCUS

The pandemic switched many of the hospital’s subspecialties and clinics towards a telehealth-based form of services. By the end of April, the hospital had conducted 51,000 outpatient visits by telehealth. 

In part, the switch to telehealth-based care has normalized the use of telehealth and video interpretation, even among providers who originally voiced their concern over the increased reliance on remote interpreting. Provider response to remote interpretation services softened during pandemic as many have, at least temporarily, come to accept the remote interpretation as inherent to the culture of ‘social distancing’ necessary during the pandemic. 

At the same time, the switch to telehealth and the restrictions placed on most non-emergency, in-person care left the hospital below prior capacity, or the number of patients the hospital normally serves. Since the onset of the pandemic, this shift freed services that at normal capacity were harder to access. The postponement of elective surgeries and non-essential interments reduced the number of total patients at the hospital. The lack of competition for interpretation services improved the rate at which department’s needs were met. 

As the hospital has returned to capacity, Massaro said she has begun to notice the same issues with the interpretation services that she noticed when the hospital was at full capacity before the pandemic.  

iPoles too have remained in short supply in certain parts of the hospital. In the YNHH’s Trumbull clinic, the 20-room wing for clinical pediatrics has only one iPole for all providers to share, Massaro said.

“Now that we’re nearing the end of the pandemic, I think we’re returning to ‘you’re gonna need to wait one to two hours’ for an interpreter or ‘you may have to wait 10 or 20 minutes for your partner to finish using an iPole down the hall,’” she said. 

(Yale Daily News)

From outside the hospital’s efforts to care for patients with the coronavirus, Massaro has continued to observe the effects of the policy changes in interpretation services on a normal basis. As an attending physician at Yale New Haven Children’s Hospital, part of her daily routine includes rounding — the daily communications between physicians, patients and family that occur for in-patients. 

Massaro’s patients are often children with cancer, thus her interactions are often with the patients and the family members by their sides. She estimates that about 50 percent of her interactions with patients and families require interpretation services. 

In New Haven, the demands for interpretation services are not likely to go away. Over the past two decades, the number of LEP patients using the hospital has continuously risen. 

Thanks to Yale New Haven Hospital’s reputation, the hospital attracts LEP patients from different parts of the world. Still, like Velazquez, the majority of LEP patients that rely on the interpretation services at Yale New Haven Hospital come from one of the city’s migrant communities. Today, 14 percent of New Haven residents are foreign-born, according to data from DataHaven’s 2020 Neighborhood Profiles series. The current number of foreign-born New Haveners is twice what it was in 1990. As of 2017, 11 percent of New Haven residents reported a low level of English proficiency, according to the hospital’s Community Health Needs Assessment

Several YNHH physicians told the News they prefer an in-person interpreter during occasions when delivering news that could lead to emotional conversations with patients and their families. According to Massaro, in-person interpreters better assist her to convey a “sentiment of concern and respect,” and ensure that families in delicate conversations are adequately cared for. Yet these physicians also emphasized that with in-patient services where patient conditions are more likely to remain stable, video-remote interpreting can work well. 

Current employees of the language services department told the News that staff interpreter participation in in-patient services like rounding has fallen significantly since the department implemented the new triage guidelines late last year. The new guidelines instruct providers to use video interpretation services as the default form of communication for many in-patient interactions.

The current triage guidelines do prioritize the use of in-person interpretation services during “family discussions” and other types of interactions that involve sensitive conversations of life and death. But this is only guaranteed when the sensitivity of the issue is known in advance and when the provider files the request with anticipation.

Massaro said she believes the conversation over the state of interpretation services at the hospital will reignite at a future point, when hospital operations return to a more normal state. 

“I think as we start to move back to our regular functionality we may see [the effect of] that change,” she said. “I can’t tell you if all the issues we had have been properly addressed because all our attention was with the pandemic.” 

Correction, Sept. 15: This article has been updated with Joan Kelly’s correct job title. It has also been updated to better reflect the sentiment of James’ comments.

(Eric Wang)

UP CLOSE:
Circuit breaking and contact tracing at Yale-NUS

Published on September 10, 2020

Nearly 17 years before COVID-19 would rattle Wuhan and the world at large, another coronavirus wreaked havoc throughout Asia, infecting over 8,000 and killing 774.

SARS — Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome — landed in Singapore in 2003 after a former flight attendant was exposed to the disease during a shopping trip to Hong Kong. Esther Mok, one of Singapore’s index patients, or “patient zero(s),” is estimated to have infected over one hundred Singaporeans, including both of her parents who died of the virus. The Lion City experienced “two months of fear” and 33 deaths as a result of SARS, according to Singapore’s National Center for Infectious Disease. For many Singaporeans, the SARS scare persisted in living memory when a novel coronavirus threatened to put the city through another public health emergency in 2020.

In the nearly two decades between outbreaks, the face of Singapore changed considerably. The city-state’s founding father, Lee Kuan Yew, passed away; a blockbuster love story inspired by the city’s elite rocked the world and the National University of Singapore partnered with Yale to create an autonomous hybrid college — Yale-NUS. Amidst all this change, Singapore was able to refine its public health infrastructure such that the new school would be among the best equipped in the world to confront a SARS-like emergency. Just last year, Singapore opened its National Center for Infectious Diseases equipped with 330 beds designed to combat a public health emergency like SARS. Unbeknownst to them, that emergency would begin on Jan. 23, 2020 when Singapore confirmed its first case of COVID-19.

While administrators and students at Yale and Yale-NUS praised, and learned from, the public health measures in place, there is no comparing SARS and COVID-19 in terms of number of cases. As of mid-September, Singapore experienced 27 deaths and over 57,000 cases due to COVID-19. SARS infected 238 Singaporeans, killing 33, according to the Straits Times.

The coronavirus pandemic crippled the school’s in-person functionality ahead of its partner institution in New Haven, allowing for Yale administrators to interface with Yale-NUS and strategize for the public health emergency to come.

Whether students are Zooming in from Southern Connecticut or Southeast Asia, the ripple effects of the pandemic have altered nearly every facet of college life. For students at Yale-NUS, directives from the Singpaorean government, college administrators and support from peers have made for a largely normal return to campus and a reimagining of undergraduate education that Yale-NUS President Tan Tai Yong believes will only make the College stronger. 

CODE ORANGE

(Asha Prihar)

On March 18, Yale-NUS spokesperson Fiona Soh updated the News on the College’s response to the novel coronavirus. At the time, the school functioned in split teams to de-densify campus spaces and all students had the option to take classes online to reduce risk of transmission. At the time, Yale-NUS was working according to its Business Continuity Plan — a set of best practices designed to maintain functionality through emergency circumstances, according to the Singapore Ministry of Manpower.

“March BCP mode” meant twice daily temperature checks for those on campus, photographic attendance checks in classrooms to facilitate contact tracing, takeaway food options and a moratorium on gatherings of more than 50 people. The school’s joint open house for prospective students held with its partner National University of Singapore was moved online at the end of February. These measures were techy, innovative and severe in contrast to what world governments were anticipating at the time. According to Yale-NUS administrators, these measures were rooted in a national protocol known as the Disease Outbreak Response System Condition, or its Cold War-esque shorthand, DORSCON.

“[National crisis guidelines] are heavily informed by Singapore’s experience with SARS and the expertise developed in infectious disease management as a result,” executive Vice President of Yale-NUS Kristen Lynas told the News in March. “When the DORSCON risk assessment level was raised in February, the College was able to trigger its business continuity plan for infectious disease within hours.”

Yale-NUS maintained a stockpile of public health equipment such as thermometers and N-95 masks. Even though the College was rolling out pandemic gear — now known worldwide as PPE, or personal protective equipment — within hours of a DORSCON Code Orange, the school was forced to move all classes online in early April as part of Singapore’s “Circuit Breaker” transmission mitigation lockdown. During the Circuit Break, which lasted from April 7 to June 1, residents could only leave their homes for essential purposes such as buying groceries, seeking medical help, reporting for national service and perhaps most consequentially, to leave Singapore.

This, of course, meant that there would be no graduation festivities for the class of 2020. 

“We were informed that we had to move out in a few days, which was quite upsetting for the student body,” said Ysien Lau, a member of the College’s 2020 graduating class. “Yale-NUS has put in effort to quickly provide housing and food for students who need it, and the student government and the College’s Residential Life team have been great in coordinating last-minute storage facilitating and move-out procedures. We have also seen an overwhelming amount of support from a supportive and caring alumni community, who have offered to help financially, with moving out, searching for career opportunities or be a listening ear.”

Feroz Khan, who graduated from Yale-NUS in 2018, was among the first alumni to respond to students’ calls for support. Khan, a member of the alumni council, told the News that the school’s young alumni base was quick to create a Google Form where students and alumni could share and meet needs.

“Within 48 hours, people offered an overwhelming amount of resources,” Khan said.

The form was able to facilitate last minute housing, emergency cash and even free counseling from alumni who work in the mental health field. Khan — who himself sent cash via Paylah, Singapore’s answer to Venmo — said that he was impressed with how much Yale-NUS was able to do for its students, saying that the alumni “really only had to help fill in the gaps.”

The administration praised the community’s ability to take sweeping directives in stride.

“This is not the first challenge we have faced as a college, and I am sure it will not be the last,” executive Vice President Joanne Roberts said. “I have been deeply encouraged by how our community has pulled together at this time to look after each other while rising to each day’s challenges. Such examples of grace and selflessness are perhaps the richest lessons that each of us can be learning during this time.”

This is not the first challenge we have faced as a college, and I am sure it will not be the last.

—Joanne Roberts, Executive Vice President of Yale-NUS

ENTER THE ZOOM ROOM

For the first semester of the 2020-2021 academic year at Yale-NUS, the college has partially opened in accordance with Singaporean government directives. The college’s cautious steps — inspired by months of troubleshooting higher education during a pandemic — have made for a campus experience preferable to some Yalies who opted to remain in Singapore instead of returning to Yale. These structural changes began, of course, with the Zoom room.

Catherine Sanger serves as director of the Center for Teaching and Learning for Yale-NUS, and was on the vanguard of developing the educational online interface most institutions of higher learning are deploying this fall.

“The disruption, both logistical and emotional, of COVID-19 has meant I’ve had to make some hard choices about content to cut from my syllabus,” Sanger said.

Sanger added that students who were developing confidence in verbal expression are no longer engaging in face-to-face dialogue, which she said is “what really stings.” She hopes that the foundation from the beginning of the semester can be built on.

Nowadays, Sanger is far from alone in her Zoom woes. One of the more obvious deficits resulting from remote learning is a lack of interpersonal contact that brightens students’ college years.

To combat the mental health impact of the pandemic on the Yale-NUS community, students deployed wellness resources and care packages to finish off the semester.

Madhumitha Ayyappan, a student in the class of 2023, worked with the Student Government and the Wellness Committee to provide care packages including hand sanitizer, healthy snacks,  comic strips about COVID cautions and coloring cards for World Mental Health Day. She also engaged professional resources to generate conversations on mental health. Ayyappan and her fellow 2023 classmate Ivy Liao coordinated a talk with a Yale-NUS counselor and a scientist from Duke-NUS, another autonomous partner university attached to the National University of Singapore. Perhaps ironically, they were able to address COVID-19 anxieties over Zoom and conduct mindfulness sessions for students.

Ayyappan commented that the College has been “extremely cognisant” of issues students are experiencing due to the pandemic.

“They’ve been extremely supportive in this period and the administration decided to offer the option to all students to exercise the Satisfactory/Unsatisfactory option for any module taken last semester,” Ayyappan told the News. 

Additionally, Ayyappan pointed toward the College’s ability to troubleshoot the logistics of a highly international student body during a pandemic. She said that Yale-NUS was willing and able to accommodate more student requests for on-campus summer housing than normal, as many international students feared they would not be able to return to Singapore if they were to leave.

She added that the school increased accessibility to emergency funding, as well.

“The College has a robust system of aid and eligible students can seek financial assistance from the College to help with post-matriculation costs that may arise, this includes exceptional costs arising from the COVID-19 crisis such as the Stay Home Notice …  required by the government,” Executive Vice President Roberts said. “Our students’ safety and well-being are of utmost concern and we hope that this is one way we can provide some relief to them during this period.”

In addition to supporting students in financial distress due to the pandemic, the College has been able to provide guidance to students who just graduated into a mid-pandemic workforce.

Celeste Beh, who graduated this May, was assigned to an advisor in the College’s Center for International and Professional Experience who helped her navigate the uncertainties of transitioning into post-graduation life. She said that the counselor reached out to her regularly and directed her to helpful resources.

Beh’s circumstances illustrate how even in a country where COVID-19 is largely under control, global economic woes threaten to hinder the transition to life after college. In the case of some Yalies, circumstances have pushed them to rethink life during college altogether.

THE DOMESTIC STUDY ABROAD PROGRAM

The Center for Disease Control reported nearly 300,000 worldwide cases of COVID-19 during the first week of the fall semester alone, and yet, there was no unified protocol for tackling the virus. For international students wary of traveling overseas and potentially putting themselves at risk in a global epicenter of the virus, returning to the United States for the fall is a formidable undertaking.

Yale Vice President for Global Strategy Pericles Lewis — who served as the inaugural president of Yale-NUS — said that Yale was more than willing to help international students find partner universities to study at during the 2020-2021 academic year.

Lindsay Allen, who works as senior associate director of international programs at Yale-NUS’ CIPE, said that Yale and Yale-NUS began to configure solutions for Singapore-based students early in the summer. Allen said her office helped interested students submit applications to the College and facilitate course registration for a COVID-esque take on education.

Five Singaporean Yale students took the school up on its offer and opted to enroll at Yale-NUS this fall. At a time when most college students’ study abroad experiences are on hold, these Yalies get to do it from the comfort of their hometown.

Before COVID-19 was characterized as a pandemic, Shermaine Koh ’22 was torn over news from her home in Singapore and a general disinterest in the virus while she was on campus in the US.

“[In January] we didn’t know anything about what was then called the ‘Wuhan virus,’” Koh said. “I just remember my family starting to be anxious and increasing numbers of cases popping up. I also remember feeling anxious for my family and yet going about life normally in the States. The conversations that were (ironically) going on then among the Singaporean students were whether or not we would go home for the summer.”

Koh said that she and other international students worried that they would not be able to return to the U.S. if they traveled to Asia, since the global virus’ epicenter was in East and Southeast Asia at the time.

She recalled worrying about whether to buy masks, and feeling alone in her anxiety about the situation.

Most of my American peers didn’t really seem too concerned about it at that point, which was perfectly normal since I also felt like being in the US made the virus (then a wee epidemic) feel like a faraway problem.

—Shermaine Koh ’22

“Most of my American peers didn’t really seem too concerned about it at that point, which was perfectly normal since I also felt like being in the US made the virus (then a wee epidemic) feel like a faraway problem,” she said.

Koh and a Singaporean friend of hers who studies in the U.K. were stuck in Toronto when news hit that their respective colleges would be online for the rest of the semester.

The Singaporean government began urging students to return home, where Koh’s parents wanted her anyway. She returned to her dorm in Silliman, lugged her belongings into the college’s storage basement and split for Singapore.

By late June, it looked unlikely that Yale would return to on-campus education in the fall, so Koh decided to reach out to Yale-NUS.

“I know this probably sounds absurd, but I’d long been casually joking about potentially taking a semester ‘abroad’ at Yale-NUS because I really wanted to take Southeast Asian studies. But that was really half in-jest,” Koh said. “It’s definitely not a joke now that I’m literally here.”

Now, Koh is again living in a residential college — Yale-NUS has three residential colleges in the style of its partner school in New Haven — where she has made new friends and has begun what she describes as the best semester ever, academically that is. As a history student with a primary interest in Southeast and East Asia, Koh said Yale-NUS has far more modules in that area than she would have been able to study at Yale.

Koh is not the only Singaporean Yalie feeling at home at home.

“I also love social life here — I actually found it easier integrating into [Yale-NUS] than Yale honestly,” Victoria Lim ’21, another Yalie who opted to enroll at Yale-NUS for the fall, said. “I clicked very quickly with my suitemates, and have met so many new people within the span of a month. The small student body means that it’s easy to expand your social network. It’s also a lot more international than Yale.”

THE NEW NORMAL

On July 1, Yalies received word from President Peter Salovey and Provost Scott Strobel that the fall semester would primarily take place remotely. Salovey reported Yale’s testing strategies and density modifications that would allow for a partial return to residential life, in accordance with guidelines from Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont.

While taking directives from state authorities reflects new territory for Yale — a private institution — Yale-NUS’ integration with the government makes unified policy response the norm. As a part of the National University of Singapore, and by extension the national government, Yale-NUS answers to the Ministries of Health and Education when it comes to an emergency like COVID-19.

“[Institutes of higher learning] can bring students back on campus for small group classes with no more than 50 persons per class,” a spokesperson from Singapore’s Ministry of Education told the News. “All necessary safe management measures are taken, such as safe distancing of at least one metre between individuals and the implementation of SafeEntry, a national digital check-in system which logs individuals’ entry into a venue.”

Equipped with high tech public health infrastructure and a commitment to carrying on, Yale-NUS was able to reopen with facilities operating “as close to normal as possible,” according to an August Yale-NUS news post.

Sophomores Ayyappan and Liao said that while campus life has certainly changed — Ayyappan called it “mellow” — college life has persisted, despite the setbacks.

“The butteries aren’t open, some classes have shifted online and sports trainings have also been modified,” Ayyappan said. “I find myself spending more time in my suite and bonding with my suitemates instead. Nonetheless, I am extremely grateful that I get to be back on campus and see my friends. Some campus activities have been shifted over to Zoom (such as mindfulness classes), so I am still able to keep in touch with the community which is truly a blessing in these uncertain times.”

In an effort to keep the sense of community alive, Liao, who serves on her residential college council, helped to reimagine a Yale-NUS tradition for life during a pandemic. The “Start of Semester Dinner” normally involves the whole of Elm College gathering in the dining hall to share a meal, but per COVID-19 restrictions, the meals were delivered to individual suites and students showcased performances over Zoom.

Social distancing guidelines have also had consequences on athletic extra curriculars. Liao, who plays on the women’s basketball team, added that she noticed “differences in the rigor” of team practices. She noted that these restrictions have migrated to the classroom as well.

“While I am grateful to still be able to attend physical classes, getting used to the new rules (such as contact tracing, mask wearing, and safe distancing) has been quite challenging,” Liao wrote in an email. “Class discussions are sometimes unable to run as they did during normal circumstances and many professors have had to alter their teaching style (e.g. less discussions, different assessments) in response to these restrictions.”

Yale-NUS CTL Director Catherine Sanger spoke to the variety of problems she has faced in planning for continuity in academic life. The greatest challenge, she said, has been the need to confront two sets of demands at the same time.

The first set of demands pertains to safety measures for the classroom — masks and distance — which she wrote “impede[s]” communication. The second set has to do with remote instruction for students who are not taking classes in person. Sanger said that students in the classroom want for the experience to resemble pre-pandemic life as much as possible while students Zooming in often have difficulty engaging with the class.

Celeste Beh experienced at least half of a semester of remote instruction and lauded professors’ efforts despite the setbacks. 

“I will say that professors have been absolute champs in the classroom. All of them tried to keep us engaged while on Zoom despite them trying to get used to the technology and the difficulty of teaching virtually themselves.”

—Celeste Beh, member of the Yale-NUS class of 2020

“I will say that professors have been absolute champs in the classroom,” Beh wrote in an email to the News. “All of them tried to keep us engaged while on Zoom despite them trying to get used to the technology and the difficulty of teaching virtually themselves. As students, we sometimes get so caught up with feeling inconvenienced by online classes that we forget our professors are getting used to it too.”

Troubleshooting the hybrid nature of the COVID-19 classroom has been successful to the extent that Sanger and Ayyappan said academic life at Yale-NUS is alive and well. Ayyappan said that she would not describe academic life at Yale-NUS as “halted.”

“We are living through a global crisis and that is distracting and deeply troubling,” Sanger wrote. “However, I have been very fortunate to be here in Singapore largely safe and able to continue with my work.”

The commitment to continuity extends to a central component of any college: the library.

Principal Librarian Priyanka Sharma told the News that the experience has led to newfound team bonding within the library and also parent departments and colleagues from across Yale-NUS. Sharma has had to innovate to deliver information literacy sessions in a COVID-19 appropriate manner. She added that the library has focused on “clear and timely communication,” and new methods of engagement with the College community, like short videos on the library’s Instagram page.

Between fortifying its social media presence and aggressively reimagining the way college students interface with a college campus, Yale-NUS, like all schools, has had to think extensively about what it means to facilitate an education. Facing the existential challenge of a pandemic forced the Yale-NUS community to preserve what it considered vital to an education, and employed a fair amount of ingenuity to do so. President Tan praised innovation from community members like Sharma and Sanger, and said that COVID-19 has presented a variety of learning opportunities for Yale-NUS.

I hope we emerge from this crisis stronger than before,” Tan said. “The crisis has taught us how to be more adaptable and resilient as a community, and given us a chance to creatively find new opportunities to improve our policies and programmes.”

(Yale Daily News)

UP CLOSE
Credence to whom: Who votes for Yale’s trustees

Published on September 9, 2020

L

ast May, as students finished up their online classes and finally shut their laptops, Yale’s alumni booted up their own computers for one annual ritual that wasn’t halted by the pandemic: the Yale Corporation election.

The process was simple: read about the two candidates — both alumni themselves — in a voter guide and make a choice. Maurie McInnis GRD ’96 graduated Yale with her Ph.D. in the History of Art and climbed through the ranks of academic administration to become the provost of the University of Texas at Austin, before moving on as president of Stony Brook University. Carlos Moreno ’70 studied political science as an undergraduate and eventually became an associate justice of the Supreme Court of California before serving as the U.S. ambassador to Belize. Just like every alumni member of the Yale Corporation, past and present, McInnis and Moreno lead in their fields as model Yale affiliates.

After the polls closed on May 17 and the votes were tallied, Yale announced the results on May 23: Carlos Moreno had clinched the Corporation seat. While a later announcement from Yale pointed out that 18,135 alumni voted and that the University saw a 7 percent increase in voter turnout from the previous year, the release did not mention the total number of eligible voters —  146,481, according to Vice President for Institutional Affairs Martha Schall, which means that only about 13 percent of alumni had cast a ballot.

According to former U.S. Ambassador to Poland and former mayor of Knoxville, Tennessee Victor Ashe ’67, the lack of voter participation in Corporation elections is “so meager, it’s embarrassing.” It “speaks volumes” about the way Yale engages with alumni, he added.

Ashe’s concern about the election is personal. Largely backed by the William F. Buckley Jr. Program, he is running for a spot on the Corporation in 2021 as a petition candidate. While a committee of alumni typically collect nominations from their peers and vet candidates who are then presented to alumni at the start of the voting period, non-nominated Corporation hopefuls can take a less-traveled route: landing on the ballot by collecting 4,394 signatures from supportive alumni on their petitions. In multiple interviews with the News, Ashe complained about the lack of voter turnout and the general secrecy of Corporation elections when it comes to nominated candidates, who typically do not campaign or give interviews about their perspectives before or after being voted into the trusteeship.

Still, Schall emphasized that voter participation did see a 7 percent increase from 2019. The reason why, she said, could be better communication between Yale and its voter base, especially in the form of emails from the Yale Alumni Association, or YAA, and other alumni leaders.

“In addition to this outreach, in the past three years the University has invested in making the voting website available and accessible on all platforms and devices,” Schall wrote. “We plan to continue these practices and types of engagement.”

But Ashe is not alone in his concerns. He is joined by fellow Corporation hopeful Maggie Thomas FES ’15, who served as a climate policy advisor to Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s presidential campaign. According to her campaign website, she is running on a platform of environment-conscious investing and inclusive governance. Beyond Thomas, interviews with 13 members of the broader Yale community — from recent alumni to current professors — revealed various speculations as to why most alumni don’t vote. Each individual proposed different solutions, ranging from changing voting rules to hosting public forums. But many agreed on one central matter: Low voter turnout is a problem for the Yale Corporation and more broadly, the University’s future.

THE CORPORATION AND ALUMNI: A HISTORY

The Corporation is the main governing body of the University, comprising 16 members and the University President. Ten of those members are successor trustees who can serve two six-year terms, while the remaining members are “alumni fellows” elected by alumni every year for staggered six-year terms.

In an interview with the News, former University Secretary Sam Chauncey ’57 explained that in 1701, 10 ministers founded Yale and became the original Trustees — one of whom was Israel Chauncey, from whom Sam Chauncey is descended. In the 1790s, the state of Connecticut added six state officials and the governor and lieutenant governor of Connecticut to the Corporation in exchange for financial assistance to Yale. In the 1870s, however, Yale replaced those state actors with six “alumni fellows.” 

Chauncey also told the News about some notable Corporation election proceedings. While several alumni have tried to run as petition candidates, only two have claimed victory in the general election: William Horowitz, class of 1929, and Stanhope Bayne-Jones, class of 1910. Horowitz, Chauncey said, ran twice in the 1960s, lost the election the first time and won the second, becoming the first Jewish person to ever serve on the Corporation. In the 1970s, founder of the National Review William F. Buckley Jr. ’50 made it onto the ballot, but lost to former Secretary of the Army Cyrus Vance ’39 LAW ’42. And in the past two years, conservative journalist James Kirchick ’06 and Georgetown Law Professor Nicholas Rosenkranz ’92 LAW ’99 both suspended their campaigns after failing to gather enough signatures. 

The relationship between the Corporation and alumni was discussed in-depth in a 1970 report, commissioned by then-Yale President Kingman Brewster ’41 and the Corporation after “considerable discussion during the preceding months as to the effectiveness of the total alumni relations effort at the University.” That report, dubbed the Dwyer Report after commissioner Martin Dwyer ’57, notes that 50 years ago, about 33 percent of alumni voted in Corporation elections — about 20 percent more than in 2020.

Even though this number is about 20 points higher than current figures of alumni participation, Yale leaders were concerned even back in 1970 about a lack of alumni involvement with Yale, according to Harry Levitt ’71, Ashe’s de facto campaign manager, and the Dwyer report.

“And we still have that same challenge today,” Levitt said. “How do we get people to become interested again in what’s going on at Yale?”

The report also revealed other alumni concerns about the Corporation, such as that the Corporation was not sufficiently effective or representative. Ashe’s campaign has taken up these issues in his campaign. He pointed out that because nominated candidates do not campaign, alumni have no understanding of the candidates’ positions on key Yale affairs, while nominated candidates may not necessarily be aware of alumni concerns. As a result, Ashe said, alumni and the nominated candidates are disconnected. 

“When only 13 percent of the alumni even bother to vote, that speaks volumes,” Ashe said. “Who should be given greater credence? Myself or Maggie, each of whom have to have [about] 4,300 signatures, or a third and fourth candidate who are selected in secret and they’re not allowed to discuss issues?”

(Christie Yu)

THE CORPORATION, “A VERY EXCLUSIVE CLUB”

According to former Yale Club of Chicago President Scott Williamson ’80, nominated candidates have helped diversify the Corporation over the years. Most of the female successor trustees, Williamson told the News, gained their positions after first being elected as vetted alumni fellows. 

In 2015, Williamson served as the Chair of the Alumni Fellow Nominating Committee, the group composed of alumni — most of whom also serve on the YAA’s Board of Governors — and tasked with identifying possible alumni fellow candidates to present a final list to the Office of the Secretary. Winnowing down lists of Corporation candidates is a drawn-out process, according to Williamson, and involves alumni submitting nominees before vetting the list further. During his time as Chair, Williamson spoke with the dean of every Yale school and several administrators to identify the type of candidate that could be an asset for Yale. 

According to Williamson, the Committee generally seeks out candidates who are prominent in their fields, diverse in background, experienced in leadership, have some demonstrated interest in Yale, and “play well in the sandbox with others.” He noted that the Committee also tries to identify gaps in Corporation expertise — for example, when his Committee realized that one Corporation blind spot was alumni relations, current Trustee and founder of shared interest alumni group YaleWomen Eve Rice ’73 was selected as a candidate. 

Generating diversity is one major consideration of the nominating committee, Williamson added. Since successor trustees tend to select replacements who are similar to themselves, he noted, the alumni fellow election tends to produce more “professional gender and racial diversity” within the Corporation.

Still, multiple alumni told the News that the Corporation could still improve its diversity, particularly when it comes to age and race.

Yale undergraduates are not authorized to vote in Corporation elections until five years after they graduate. Former President of Yale’s South Asian Society Dev Bhatia ’92 told the News that this rule disenfranchises a large group of alumni, a significant portion of whom are minority students, who are more likely to be interested in voting.

Using data from Yale’s Office of Institutional Research, Bhatia calculated that 21.3 percent of “ethnic minorities” who graduated from Yale since 1985 have done so in the past five years. Citing these statistics in a recent op-ed for the New Haven Register and in an interview with the News, Bhatia said that one can draw a straight line from the larger number of recently graduated minorities students to the policy ramifications when those minorities — and younger alumni in general — are barred from Corporation elections.

“Number one, you diminish overall results,” Bhatia told the News. “The most excited people are the recent graduates. If you’re not going to include them, you’re completely silencing the voices, you’re discouraging them from participating even when they’re able to later on.”

“Not surprisingly, therefore, there is a widely held view among the University’s own alumni that Yale may be run by a very exclusive club.”

—The Dwyer Report

Nods to a lack of representation are included within the Dwyer Report, which says that the historical — in 1970 — homogeneity of Corporation members was a major barrier to alumni interest in the governing body.

“A board of trustees which has never in its two hundred and sixty-nine year history included a Catholic, a female or a sub-thirty year old, cannot inspire much confidence among [our] alumni that they are full and equal members of the Yale community,” the report says. “Not surprisingly, therefore, there is a widely held view among the University’s own alumni that Yale may be run by a very exclusive club.”

But the commission could find little justification for continuing the homogeneity of the Corporation into the future, the report states. Since then, the Corporation has diversified, with women and people of color accounting for a significant portion of its membership. 

Still, Bhatia noted that the rule barring younger alumni from voting seems “indefensible.”  

“If you say to me, hey, minorities have gotten there by being nominated by other board members, that’s great. That’s great, and God bless them,” Bhatia said. “But we haven’t addressed the systematic issues that prevent other minorities with specific takes from being in that room.”

Still, Chauncey and Vice President for Communications Nate Nickerson said there are legal hurdles of changing the five-year rule. Since the Yale Charter is embedded in the state constitution, it requires an act by the State of Connecticut Legislature to open the charter and make any changes. 

The five-year rule has been on record since 1871. But when asked about the rationale behind the five-year rule, Schall wrote that she was not aware “of any historical documents that record the reason for the legislature’s decision.”

WHO VOTES, WHO DOESN’T AND WHY

According to Thomas, a number of factors feed into low turnout. Most alumni that her team speaks to, Thomas said, have no idea that a petition process is ongoing. Often those same alumni are not familiar with the Corporation as a whole. As Thomas and her team phone bank to raise their number of signatures, conversations often end up being more about educating alumni about Corporation elections — a sign that the University hasn’t done its job, Thomas told the News. 

Both Thomas and her campaign manager Scott Gigante GRD ’23 emphasized a lack of awareness about the Corporation elections among alumni.

“A lot of alumni don’t know about the election in general, and many who do, don’t seem to consider the election to be important,” Gigante told the News. “I think the barriers to entry in terms of getting a diverse range of viewpoints onto that election and discussing what is at stake is feeding into why alumni either don’t know or don’t care that there is an election.”

According to University President Peter Salovey, it’s hard to speculate why most alumni do not vote.

“We live in a world where people are bombarded with information coming by email or more traditional mail, and I think it’s hard to break through all of that and get people’s sustained attention,” Salovey told the News in an interview. “I would say people vary in how involved they want to be with the University in their thinking after graduation. But I want to do everything we can to encourage people to keep the University in their hearts and minds and participate in its future by involving themselves in the choosing of trustees.” 

Executive Director of the YAA Weili Cheng ’77 told the News that she and her office would “love to see” more participation in the alumni fellow process. She listed several ways that Yale has attempted to communicate better with alumni: stories, FAQs, social media and emails. 

Cheng added that since alumni fellow candidates are both suggested by and selected by alumni, nominated candidates do indeed represent the wishes of alumni. 

“To that end, the elected alumni fellow reflects the alumni population and the alumni voice — and we want every alum to feel like they’ve played a role in that election,” Cheng wrote in an email to the News.

As for why some alumni choose not to vote, Cheng wrote that she is unsure. Still, she said, her office “truly want[s]” to engage all alumni in the process, and she wrote that Yale has made “a concerted effort” to make voting easier and more accessible in recent years, a process that is ongoing. She also noted the 7 percent increase that Schall did, saying that she hopes for a similar or larger jump in 2021.

(Yale Daily News)

Professor of English Mark Oppenheimer ’96 GRD ’03 added that he sees three reasons why alumni don’t vote. First, he wrote to the News, people graduate and drift away from the Yale sphere of influence. Second, he noted that because the Corporation and Association of Yale Alumni “handpick” candidates, there is “nothing to pay attention to.” He then compared Corporation elections to proceedings in communist countries, where some elections have “fore-ordained conclusions.”

“Third, in my case, there is the disgust I feel for the cynical way that the Corporation maneuvers to ensure that no critics of the University ever get onto the Corporation,” Oppenheimer wrote.

In response, Nickerson wrote to the News in an email that the selection of alumni fellows is led by alumni throughout the process, “from nominations to the selection of candidates to the election itself.”

He noted the contentious election of 2002, where the petition candidate the Rev. W. David Lee DIV ’93 lost to Maya Lin ’81 ARCH ’86, well-known architect and designer of the Women’s Table on Cross Campus who was recruited by Yale “at the last minute” to run, according to Oppenheimer. According to a News article from the time, that election served as the most controversial Corporation election in Yale’s history — and it brought 44 percent of eligible Yale alumni voters to the ballot box. The final tally: about 83 percent of the vote to Lin, while Lee lost with about 17 percent.

Oppenheimer told the News that this election marked the “University at its absolute worst,” and said that Lin was recruited only to make sure that Lee — a Black local New Haven politician with liberal and pro-union views — did not win a seat on the Corporation. News of Lee’s candidacy bounced from New Haven to beyond, with the New York Times noting the heightened stakes of that particular election. Writing in an April 11, 2002 article, the Times said that while Corporation elections are “normally sleepy affair[s] with just a few candidates and none of the messy machinations of a political campaign,” Lee as a union-backed candidate had upset the typically low-radar process.

In an interview with the News, Chauncey disagreed with Oppenheimer’s take on the 2002 election. In his opinion, Chauncey said, since Lee had no management experience and would likely have acted solely as an agent of his union backers, he was distinctly unqualified to serve as a trustee. Still, Chauncey said, Yale would be wrong to propose their own agents in the election simply to defeat qualified candidates — and both Thomas and Ashe, he added, are in his view qualified for the role.

RULES ON NO CAMPAIGNING 

According to a Sept. 3 email from Schall, it has been a longstanding practice — although not an official rule — that nominated candidates typically do not campaign.

From a practical standpoint, she wrote, most candidates selected do not have the time or resources to mount a major campaign. From a governance standpoint, she added, all trustees must contribute to the Corporation without conflicts of interest or other obligations that could slant their focus away from Yale.

“In their roles, trustees are asked to deliberate and make complex, strategic decisions to ensure the welfare of the University not just now, but years into the future,” Schall wrote. “As fiduciaries, they must ensure that Yale provides the same level of, if not greater, support to current community members and future generations.”

Still, the no-campaign understanding was put into writing on the Alumni Fellow Election website in 2018 in an effort to “avoid confusion,” University Secretary Kimberly Goff-Crews ’83 LAW ’86 told the News at the time. Previously, no mention of the policy could be found in the Yale Charter, the Corporation bylaws or the miscellaneous regulations that govern some Corporation activities.

Alumni in general have mixed views about how Corporation elections ought to be run and why their fellow graduates may not vote. Sarah Katherman ’82 told the News that while she was surprised at the low level of voter turnout, she would not change anything about Corporation elections if given the opportunity. The important thing for the Corporation, she said, is that the body is formed out of a diverse cast of members, the potential for which can be easily seen in the nominated candidates.

Katherman added that she would oppose campaigning by nominated candidates, because she believes that campaigning could derail a candidate’s focus from governing the University.

“The last thing I would want is for it to end up being like a personality contest or something where people are campaigning and trying to get your vote,” Katherman said. “I just think that’s sort of … that creates a different kind of homogeneity because it [means] the only people that would be on the Corporation are the people that would be not only willing but interested in going through that kind of a process, and personally I think that process is pretty gross.”

Campaigning, she added, would likely discourage dedicated applicants to the Corporation who are not attracted to the campaign aspect.

School of Architecture Critic Surry Schlabs ’99 ARCH ’03 agreed with Katherman, saying that he would not want a “full-blown” political campaign for Corporation candidates. Still, he added, a platform where interested voters could interact with the candidates and ask questions could help clear some of the fog.

“It’s not a political campaign, it has nothing to do with conservative or liberal ideas. It has to do with how the University best addresses its charter or its order of business, which is to educate young leaders that are going to grow up and become productive citizens of our society.”

—Richard Swett ’79, former U.S. ambassador to Denmark

Unlike Katherman and Schlabs, former U.S. Ambassador to Denmark Richard Swett ’79 — who is supporting Ashe’s candidacy — said he supports the campaigning of Corporation candidates.

“It’s not a political campaign, it has nothing to do with conservative or liberal ideas,” Swett told the News. “It has to do with how the University best addresses its charter or its order of business, which is to educate young leaders that are going to grow up and become productive citizens of our society.”

Swett said that after he finished his ambassadorship, he began working with some communities in Africa to build opportunities for jobs and housing. In the past 10 years, he said, he has worked with some corrupt governments that have very limited access to and communication with their constituencies. This experience, he said, proved that only through strong democracies can citizens have enough information to choose the best leader.

ALUMNI “REAWAKENED”

In the past week, both Ashe and Thomas’ campaigns have reached the signature threshold — Ashe on Sept. 1 and Thomas on Sept. 8. A third-party election services corporation is examining their petitions for double votes or invalid signatures, but Ashe and Thomas are confident that they will secure spots on May’s ballot.

“If elected, I will be the best trustee I can be, thinking of Yale’s needs for both today and tomorrow,” Ashe wrote in an email to his supporters. “I promise to do my best to understand the views of alumni/ae … Thank you for your support. I look forward to keeping you updated on our progress. I love Yale and I know that together we can achieve change for a better Yale.”

Levitt, Ashe’s campaign manager, told the News that Ashe’s campaign seems to have “reawakened” alumni who otherwise had no interest in the election process. Echoing Levitt, Gigante told the News that despite typically low voter turnout in the elections, Thomas’ campaign and its goals have lit a fire in alumni who would not otherwise vote.

“In phone banking and calling alumni,” Gigante said. “I’ve spoken to plenty of people who say, ‘I don’t typically get involved in these elections. I’m not normally interested in participating in Yale’s governance, but this cause is exciting and I’m happy to participate and excited to participate.”

As Thomas and Ashe both clamor for alumni to vote, some Yale administrators in addition to Schall and Cheng told the News that the University welcomes more active participation.

Salovey told the News that “the greater the participation, the better,” and that high turnout is better than low turnout because it indicates that Yale’s alumni are investing in their alma mater. He also noted the YAA’s efforts to encourage interest in elections.

In an email to the News, Senior Trustee Catharine Bond Hill GRD ’85 wrote that she and her fellow Trustees want to see as many alumni as possible casting “informed and considered votes.”

“Over the course of their tenures, trustees will grapple with a wide range of complicated, nuanced, and frequently ambiguous problems and opportunities they could not have predicted, and whose resolution will often have profound consequences,” Hill wrote. “Yale has been very wise over its 319 years to select trustees whose experience and disposition lend rigor, creativity, and wisdom to the decisions that shape our future.”

Though more than eight months away, the 2021 election stands to make history in a myriad of ways. Ashe and Thomas are the first candidates to gather enough signatures in 18 years, and Thomas will be the second female petition candidate, after Heidi Hartmann GRD ’74 reached the signature goal in 1985 but faced five nominated candidates and lost to former U.S. Sen. Paul Tsongas LAW ’67. 

“Participating in elections is one of the most powerful ways any individual can influence the world they live in,” Thomas said. “Today, people are taking notice of the institutions that govern their lives and are working to hold them accountable. We face so many crises as a nation, and voters — whether in federal, state, local or private elections — realize they can help shape what we do to confront and overcome them.”

(Yale Daily News)

UP CLOSE
Yale and the City: A pandemic and a plan

Published on September 8, 2020

Looking out onto Chapel Street from behind the closed Vanderbilt gates, a quarantined Yalie might spot off-campus students enjoying ice cream from Arethusa Farm Dairy, buying a gift to send home from Ten Thousand Villages, or emerging from Sushi on Chapel with takeout rolls ready for dinner.

To many Yale, city and state officials, this would be evidence that the University’s reopening plan is working the way it is supposed to — limiting viral spread in New Haven while benefiting the city economically.

Still, one thing remains invisible to the naked eye: the coronavirus that necessitated the closure of Old Campus in the first place.

In interviews with the News, Yale administrators and public officials remained cautiously optimistic about the University’s reopening plan and students’ return to campus and the Elm City at large. Many pointed out the economic benefits of the students’ return to New Haven, including increased support for local businesses in Downtown New Haven and the resumption of regular employment for many Yale staff members.

The reopening itself, albeit partial, was the result of much coordination and planning between the state of Connecticut, the city of New Haven, and universities — public and private — throughout the Nutmeg State. All parties to those negotiations said that communication and consistent reopening criteria have been critical to the reopening going ahead mostly as planned since early July.

Some concerns remain, however, mostly regarding the testing of staff members and the decision-making process behind the plan.

“I think there’s definitely some concern among other folks in the community about people bringing the virus back to New Haven, especially because we’ve seen such a solid decline in cases over the last few months,” Ward 1 Alder Eli Sabin ’22 told the News in an interview. “A lot of folks are also excited to have a lot of the young folks who bring so much energy and life to New Haven back. From a dollars-and-cents perspective as well, there are a lot of folks in our city who are employed by Yale and various other colleges.”

“I think there’s definitely some concern among other folks in the community about people bringing the virus back to New Haven, especially because we’ve seen such a solid decline in cases over the last few months. A lot of folks are also excited to have a lot of the young folks who bring so much energy and life to New Haven back.”

—Eli Sabin '22, Ward 1 Alder

INITIAL PLANS EMERGE

Planning for a fall reopening of Connecticut colleges and universities began at the state level in the spring, according to Josh Geballe ’97 SOM ’02, chief operating officer of the governor’s office. On April 23, Gov. Ned Lamont announced the foundation of the Reopen Connecticut Advisory Group, co-chaired by former PepsiCo CEO Indra Nooyi SOM ’80 and Yale School of Public Health department chair of epidemiology Albert Ko. 

The Education Committee of the advisory group, co-chaired by former Yale President Rick Levin and former Yale Vice President for Global and Strategic Initiatives Linda Lorimer, was tasked with building criteria for higher education institutions to reopen safely. Geballe emphasized the role of Yale alumni, experts and administrators in the success of Connecticut’s pandemic response.

“Governor Lamont, throughout this whole pandemic, has understood that public health considerations have to come first. Our view is there’s no way to truly reopen the economy if you’re in a situation where the virus is running rampant,” Geballe said in an interview. “Our priority was to establish criteria for our colleges and universities to reopen safely and ensure that each of them, including Yale, were putting the necessary steps in place to reopen safely.”

Connecticut was the first state to produce such guidelines when Levin and Lorimer published a report on the necessary steps for university reopenings in early May. Presented to Lamont, the report recommended schools have robust plans to contain the coronavirus if an outbreak occurred on campus and plans to shut down again if necessary.

Levin said that Lamont thanked the committee for the report. Levin has not been involved in subsequent decision-making about reopening plans for Yale or other Connecticut colleges, he said. He declined to comment any further for this story.

Yale President Peter Salovey has been in regular contact with Lamont and Mayor Justin Elicker about the University’s plans for the fall semester, Salovey told the News in an email.

“Both the governor and mayor have been thinking a lot about higher education during the pandemic,” Salovey wrote. “They support going back to teaching and learning to the greatest extent possible while safeguarding the well-being of everyone on college campuses and in the surrounding communities.”

At the beginning of the pandemic, Salovey convened a public health advisory group as well. After initially advising about the shutdown of campus in the spring, that group turned its attention towards the University’s reopening plans starting in June, according to Yale Health Director Paul Genecin, who serves on the advisory team. The team worked with a host of other Yale bodies to make sure the reopening plan was logistically sound, including Facilities, Yale College, and all of the professional schools.

“We cannot escape the fact that we will have some COVID cases at Yale. Our goal is to prevent uncontrolled spread in this community,” Genecin told the News in an email. “Yale has created a unique system for its students and we will try to contain the spread of any infection through a series of behavioral expectations, changes to the environment, biweekly testing for students, contact tracing, isolation and quarantine.”

Genecin added that all of the elements of the plan need to function properly and in unison in order for it to be successful.

Representatives from Yale New Haven Health have also been at every meeting of the advisory group, Genecin said. Representatives from YNHH were unavailable for comment on this story.

ELM CITY COLLABORATION

“My overall feeling is that the university and the city coordinated quite well together. In general, we have been cautiously optimistic about Yale coming back in-person.”

—Mayor Justin Elicker

After Salovey announced Yale’s fall reopening plans to the University community on July 1, the University, along with other local colleges and universities, explained its plan in webinars and meetings with city officials. On July 15, Yale and other colleges presented their fall reopening plans to alders on the Human Services Committee. 

“My overall feeling is that the university and the city coordinated quite well together,” Elicker told the News in an interview. “In general, we have been cautiously optimistic about Yale coming back in-person.”

However, Yale and City Hall have not been on completely amicable terms since the pandemic started. Back in March, Yale initially declined Elicker’s request to use dorm rooms to house New Haven public safety officers if they were to be exposed to the coronavirus. After the University declined, Elicker called University of New Haven President Steve Kaplan, who agreed immediately to house first responders there. At a press conference the next week, Elicker criticized Yale for declining the request — a day after the University set up an emergency fund to aid the city’s response.

A day later, the University reversed its decision and pledged to open up 300 rooms for use, more than double the original request.

The next week, during a Board of Alders budget hearing, multiple residents called on Yale to contribute more to the city’s coffers. 

For the reopening plan, though, Elicker told the News that, when it comes to “the nuts and bolts of what we need to get done,” Yale and City Hall “work together.” He added that he still thinks that Yale needs to play a much more significant financial role in the future of New Haven, including by helping to reduce systemic income inequality by investing more in the city.

On Aug. 12, Yale representatives participated in a webinar hosted by the Economic Development Administration about local institutions’ return plans and how to ensure students and New Haveners stay safe. Representatives from Albertus Magnus College and Southern Connecticut State University also attended the briefing.

Leadership from each of Greater New Haven’s six higher education institutions — Yale, Albertus, Southern, Quinnipiac University, the University of New Haven and Gateway Community College — also participated in a conference hosted by the Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce last week in which they discussed their schools’ plans and implementation thus far.

THE ECONOMIC ARGUMENT

Local businesses, especially those immediately surrounding Yale and in Downtown, have suffered immensely from a lack of students and Downtown commuting workers since the pandemic began to affect the Elm City in March.

Recent closures include Clark’s Family Restaurant and Freskos on Whitney Avenue and The Beer Collective and Duc’s Place elsewhere in Downtown.

“Yale University Properties has worked in close partnership with its retail and restaurant tenants throughout the pandemic to support them through these difficult times,” Associate Vice President for New Haven Affairs and University Properties Lauren Zucker told the News in an email. “We know that the New Haven business community greatly appreciates the support of the Yale community and that appreciation is mutual.”

City officials and business owners hope the arrival of students will help to boost local businesses and the wider Greater New Haven economy. In addition to 1,821 undergraduate students living on campus — or about 36 percent of the University’s normal capacity — there are about 1,530 enrolled students living in off-campus housing in New Haven, according to Yale officials.

“I think it’s great to have the students back, enlivening the town, once they complete their quarantine,” Yale College Dean Marvin Chun told the News in an email. “Everyone’s priority is the safety and well-being of our students, staff, faculty, and the New Haven community.”

“Having students back is only going to be a positive for the economy locally. It’s going to take some time still. It’s not going to be like, ‘Hey, we’ve got students back, everything is normal,’ but it’s a good first step.”

—Garrett Sheehan, President of Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce

However, Connecticut rules in effect to curb the spread of the coronavirus — including the mandatory 14-day quarantine for students and travelers arriving from hot spot states and continued restrictions on indoor dining and live events — mean that any economic benefits offered by the return of students will remain muted for the foreseeable future.

“It’s a positive first step, but, with the way restrictions are, it’s obviously not going to be the same,” said Garrett Sheehan, the president of the Greater New Haven Chamber of Commerce. “I feel confident that they’re putting in the best process possible and hopefully that works… Having students back is only going to be a positive for the economy locally. It’s going to take some time still. It’s not going to be like, ‘Hey, we’ve got students back, everything is normal,’ but it’s a good first step.”

Outside of effects on local businesses, 24 percent of the job base in the region is related to academic services, said city Economic Development Administrator Michael Piscitelli. Having students back and paying tuition at all six colleges and universities ensures that many New Haveners will still be employed by the schools themselves.

In March, the University continued to operate critical campus functions with the support of 2,000 staff members. Now, thanks to the gradual reopening of research functions and other operations, there are about 9,000 faculty and staff with authorization to be on campus, Yale spokeswoman Karen Peart told the news in an email.

Other parts of the New Haven economy will take a little longer to bounce back, though, including tourism. The Omni Hotel remains closed, Yale is not running campus tours and Ivy League football will not happen this fall.

“Right now and through the pandemic, in addition to school coming back into session, it’s really important to start to rebuild hospitality, tourism and reopen the museums,” Piscitelli said. “Yale is an essential part of the Downtown restaurant and retail base. The students, the faculty, the vibrancy the university brings to our downtown are very important pieces to the puzzle… The meaningful nature of the work the students are doing is equally important.”

The return of students to New Haven has additional benefits for the Elm City. Piscitelli mentioned that many undergraduate and graduate students are contributing to ongoing research in the development of therapeutics and vaccines for the coronavirus. Throughout the pandemic, Yale students have contributed to the city of New Haven’s response through Yale Emergency Support-New Haven, and individuals worked for local nonprofits over the summer through programs like the President’s Public Service Fellowship. 

(Megan Graham)

PERSISTING CONCERNS

Still, some have concerns about the return of students, the decision-making process behind the plan, and the message it sends to New Haven community members.

“I definitely think the conversations were framed around how we can get students back safely and minimize the risk to New Haven, not necessarily maximizing the safety of New Haveners and questioning if it would benefit the city for students to come back at all,” Yale College Council President Kahlil Greene ’21 told the News in an email. “Conversations were, in my opinion, very Yale-focused.”

Greene served on the University’s Academic Continuity Committee, where he helped to hammer out details in the return plan. Other YCC members also served on college-level task forces concerned with the delivery methods for teaching. Greene warned there could be “severe consequences” for the Elm City if students do not “follow the rules and comply with testing” requirements and quarantine procedures.

Every Yale official who spoke with the News emphasized the responsibility the student body has to prevent an outbreak on campus and in the city and the importance of following the University’s rules on gatherings, masking and social distancing.

The lack of a coherent and mandatory testing system for graduate students, faculty and staff remains a concern for other members of the community.

Ben Oldfield, chief medical officer of Fair Haven Community Health Care, said his experience with the Yale plan comes through speaking with Yale staff members that are patients at the clinic.

“Recently, we have seen a lot of patients who have concerns,” Oldfield said. “The nature of the concerns are reasonable, but sort of general. What I’ve heard is, ‘Well, gosh, there’s going to be a lot more people at my place of work.’ … I do feel like it’s a well-thought-out plan and so I have had conversations with patients in the clinic where I’ve tried to explain the fact that I think this is a well-thought-out plan.”

Oldfield said that the Yale reopening plan was subject to health disparities between students living in New Haven and staff working alongside them on campus. The Yale student body skews healthier and younger than the staff who work in Yale Dining or Yale Facilities, for example. As such, staff — many of whom come from communities of color like Fair Haven and the Hill that have been hit disproportionately hard by the coronavirus pandemic in the city and nationwide — are more likely to have higher incidence of comorbidities like diabetes or asthma. These health realities, when paired with less stringent testing for staff, contribute to a “milieu where outcomes can be worse” if a staff member were to contract the virus, Oldfield said.

Yale officials made it clear that the University was not infringing on city health resources with its testing program. Yale is also undertaking its own contact-tracing program to relieve stress on the city’s contact-tracing workforce, Genecin told the News.

Oldfield likened the plan to a luxury car — since Yale is focusing so many resources on regular testing and contact tracing, the program is more likely to prevent an outbreak than something less robust, just like a more expensive car is likely to perform better than a cheaper one.

“The Yale testing strategy is a bit of a Cadillac strategy that will be very effective. I wish we had systems like that for other folks,” Oldfield said. “I would love to see Yale take a more of a leadership role in really expanding testing into vulnerable communities.”

There remains an obvious disparity between the availability of testing for Yale community members and New Haveners unaffiliated with the University. At Fair Haven Community Health, patients can get a test within one to two days and receive a result between 48 and 72 hours after that for free, Oldfield said. He added that earlier in the summer, when states in the South and West were experiencing spikes in cases, it took labs longer to turn around results for his patients. Throughout the country, limited lab capacity remains an issue for processing tests.

“I definitely think the conversations were framed around how we can get students back safely and minimize the risk to New Haven, not necessarily maximizing the safety of New Haveners and questioning if it would benefit the city for students to come back at all.”

—Kahlil Greene '21, Yale College Council President

BEYOND YALE

Each Greater New Haven college has a slightly different plan due to differences in the number of students that live on campus and the availability of teaching materials to students at home. For example, art and culinary classes are being held in person at Gateway because many students do not have access to the equipment they need to learn. All five colleges with residential options have some students returning to campus, and all five will move to entirely online classes after Thanksgiving break.

Yale is doing the most testing of any college in the area, however. Students at Albertus and Southern were tested upon arrival, and a random sample of 5 to 10 percent of their student bodies will be tested weekly throughout the semester.

Still, each college’s overall goals are the same, and the city is working with each school to make sure its plan works for its particular culture and demographics, according to Jennifer Vazquez, director of public health nursing for the New Haven Health Department. Yale has the greatest percentage of enrolled students from outside of Connecticut of the six Greater New Haven colleges. During normal times, Yale also hosts the highest percentage of undergraduates in on-campus housing. 

“We do believe there are good plans in place. We continue to do education and track data very closely,” Vazquez said. “We want to provide support where we can, so we are very optimistic we will be able to continue to work well together.”

As of Monday night, Albertus, Gateway and Quinnipiac had not reported new coronavirus cases since classes began. As of Aug. 30, the University of New Haven had two cases among commuter students and, as of Sept. 5, Southern had reported two cases among on-campus students and staff and four self-reported cases among commuter students. As of last Wednesday, Yale has reported 11 cases since the start of August among students and staff.

Elsewhere in the state, UConn’s Storrs campus has seen 100 positive cases among residential students since testing started on campus on Aug. 14, according to data updated on Monday. 

Despite rises in cases on college campuses across Connecticut, state Rep. Pat Dillon SPH ’98 — whose district includes the New Haven neighborhoods of Dwight, West River, Edgewood and Westville — said that colleges should not blame students when things go wrong and make sure that students have the tools they need to prevent the spread of the virus.

“I don’t think it’s a threat to the city at all that people are coming back, and I don’t think it’s a threat to the students,” Dillon said in an interview with the News. “It just takes a lot of thinking.”

Dillon is also the deputy majority leader in the Connecticut House of Representatives, and her husband, John Hughes, is the assistant director of the Yale School of Medicine’s biomedical ethics program.

Dillon also said she was proud of how much progress the city and the state had made on containing the coronavirus since the worst days of April, but added that the progress “does not mean much” to her because cases could rise again if “we do not build safeguards.”

Still, Ward 22 Alder Jeanette Morrison wants students to feel welcome in New Haven provided they follow the rules.

“As long as [the students] are safe, they quarantine as expected and they do all of the testing that Yale has put in place. This is their home, too,” Morrison said. “I don’t ever want students to feel like they’re just visitors. They’re here longer than they are wherever they live, so I welcome them home.”

(Courtesy of Yale News)

UP CLOSE:
Confronting costs during COVID-19

Published on September 7, 2020

When Eugene Thomas ’22 received an email from Yale College announcing the closure of residential colleges in March, he knew he would have to look for a job to replace the earnings from his student job on campus, while also continuing his spring classes online. 

A first-generation, low-income student, Thomas receives Yale’s most generous financial aid, a package with a $0 parent contribution — but he worried that the loss of his campus job, coupled with the need to help his family pay for groceries once he arrived at home, would pose a financial burden for him. Upon first reading the email announcing the closure, he reached out to different connections he had back in his hometown of New York City as well as his high school internship coordinator to see if there were any available jobs. He hoped to work at his old high school, but a week later, New York City public schools announced they would continue the semester remotely and stopped all non-essential work. Thomas was jobless.

“I had reached out to so many different connections that I had within New York City, about potential job plans and of course didn’t hear anything back because those people didn’t know anything at all about jobs during COVID,” Thomas said.

Thomas’ worries were later alleviated when Yale announced it would provide students with room and board refunds and compensate them for their projected work study hours. Still, he was not alone in his initial concerns. As Yale and other schools across the nation closed their campuses on short notice at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March, students were forced to scramble for alternate housing arrangements and flights home — a situation that proved costly for many students from low-income backgrounds.

Meanwhile, the pandemic left the University with the task of creating a financially feasible plan to support students during a time of unprecedented chaos and confusion. According to the Yale financial aid website, the University in the past few months has “specifically focused” on meeting the needs of students and families facing significant challenges as a result of the pandemic. Interviews with University administrators and students from various financial backgrounds offer an inside look into Yale’s actions, considerations and priorities as it aimed to support students who were struck particularly hard by the financial ramifications of the pandemic this spring.

PROVIDING REFUNDS

According to Senior Associate Dean of Yale College Burgwell Howard, the University began to gather the available public health information from the state and federal government as the pandemic picked up in early March. Administrators decided to rapidly shift the remainder of the semester to an exclusively online format, to help de-densify the campus community and reduce the chance of an outbreak among University students, staff and faculty.

“Residential colleges are inherently social spaces that bring students together in the dining halls, common area and suites, and of course classrooms are, too,” wrote Yale College Dean Marvin Chun in an email to the News. “Ordinarily, this proximity among students is an advantage, but here it posed insurmountable challenges to containing an outbreak. From a public health perspective, it was essential to de-crowd campus as soon as possible. For most students, the safest place to go was home.”

(Yale News)

According to Howard, the Yale College Dean’s Office felt it safest for students to head straight home from wherever they were during spring break rather than first returning to campus. 

Amid the confusion, University administrators say that Yale aimed to promote equity despite the unprecedented circumstances. In an effort to lower the barriers to students complying with this need, students who had purchased emergency travel tickets to go home or tickets in hopes of returning back to campus on April 15 — the original date that the University announced students would be able to return to campus — were reimbursed.

In late March, the University announced that all students living on campus or participating in the meal plan — regardless of financial aid status — would be eligible to receive pro-rated credits for room and board. This amount totaled to $3,648.65 and was based on the number of days remaining in the term after residential colleges closed.  Students had the option to either request a refund or leave the credit in their accounts for future semesters. 

After the announcement, Thomas requested a refund for the full amount. This refund, coupled with remote work study, not only allowed him to focus on his online education, but also served as the main source of income for his family. 

The decision to issue the credits was made by the Yale College Dean’s Office. According to former Dean of Student Affairs Camille Lizarríbar, this decision came after it became clear what portion of room and board students would not use. The refunds issued, she said, were intended to help students with their living expenses. 

According to Chun, these refunds were a “loss, certainly, that will need to be covered by Yale’s budget.”

Funds for both the credits and transport home for students were collected from across all budgets within Yale College as well as Yale’s designated emergency funds. In light of the closure of the residential colleges, all spending from Yale College departments was suspended so that all available funds that might normally be used in April, May or June, could be diverted to the needs of the emergency, Howard said. 

Abnner Olivares ’23, a first-generation and low-income student, was back home in Los Angeles when he was told not to return to campus. Living with a family of nine in housing meant for three people — in addition to waking up three hours earlier for online classes — impacted Olivares’s academic performance due to his new living circumstances.

After the announcement of the housing and dining credit, Olivares requested a refund. During the remainder of the spring semester, he used the money to help support his family as his father had stopped working. In addition to helping support his family, he used some of the money for expenses during his summer internship.

Abeyaz Amir ’22, another first-generation, low-income student, said that the room and board credits helped alleviate a lot of the earlier stress he had regarding rent payments. Both Amir and Thomas spent their room and board credits on rent and family groceries, then deposited the remaining balance in their bank accounts. Amir said that credits issued were partly used to cover two months of mortgages on his family’s house. This, he said, allowed him to have a stable place to study.

“I was actually really shocked by this because I had already assumed that tuition-paying students would be receiving a refund,” Amir said. “But I do think that it’s great that they gave a refund to everyone because I technically ‘would use’ that money. I got back like $3,700 which is … more money than I have in my bank account right now. To me it’s a huge sum of money.”

Although Amir and some other students receiving financial aid weren’t expecting to receive the funds, it was important for Yale to take living costs into consideration regardless of financial aid status, said Director of Undergraduate Financial Aid Scott Wallace-Juedes.

“From my perspective, I think it’s just important that we treated all students the same, regardless of whether or not it came from financial aid or whether [funds] came from the families themselves,” Wallace-Juedes said. “Because, I mean, financial aid includes room and board in our cost of attendance for very specific reasons — because it’s a real expense for families. So you’re either paying it out of pocket, or if you don’t have the funds to pay it.”

I was actually really shocked by this because I had already assumed that tuition-paying students would be receiving a refund. But I do think that it’s great that they gave a refund to everyone because I technically ‘would use’ that money. I got back like $3,700 which is … more money than I have in my bank account right now. To me it’s a huge sum of money.

—Abeyaz Amir '22

OTHER EQUITY CONCERNS

Although the room and board refunds alleviated financial pressure for many students after campus shut down, equity concerns still remained following the campus closure and sudden switch to remote learning.

Students who were unable to return home — either because home was not a safe or viable option or because of the rapidly evolving travel restrictions — were permitted to remain on campus with safety guidelines in place.

These decisions included consolidating the number of dining halls, while addressing students’ dietary needs, de-densifying student housing on campus, while making sure students still had some access to a “community” of other remaining students and ensuring that students had access to critical services like Yale Health.

“The primary issues were related to food, housing, healthcare and general safety,” Howard said. “So the most pressing decisions were focused on how to address these concerns, while offering the opportunity for as much normalcy for the remaining students.”

For students returning home, administrators took stock of what resources they would need to complete the semester remotely.

“Once students had arrived safely home, we began trying to assess the needs of students to complete the semester remotely — beginning with those students we knew had the greatest financial needs, or may have the most limited access to the technology necessary to complete the semester,” Howard said.

The YCDO organized a plan to retrieve laptops and other essential items from student rooms on campus and ship them to students. Emergency loans of laptops and Wi-Fi hotspots were also provided for students who did not have access to a computer or stable internet connection. In certain cases, emergency grants were provided to students in order to enhance their home internet capacities or to fund repairs on their existing technology to allow students to participate in their online classes, Howard said.

COSTS TO THE UNIVERSITY

The only permitted departmental spending during this period was for student wages. Departments, residential colleges and University offices continued to pay student workers their expected hourly wages for remote work. In cases where remote work was impossible, departments were instructed to pay their student workers for the number of hours they would have spent working had they remained on campus. For some students, continuing to receive these wages has filled the gaps in family income.

“Basically the money I’ve [been] getting from campus I’m saving because my dad has stopped working, since he’s 65, and the money I make is helping support us for a little,” Olivares said.

In addition to student accommodations during the pandemic, the University also had to formulate a plan for staff members who shifted to working on a significantly depopulated campus.

According to University Provost Scott Strobel, Yale Housing and Dining staff continued to be paid throughout the spring and summer. In addition, the Yale Housing and Dining staff are currently being paid the same amount and with the same number of workers as they would if the campus was operating at full capacity, Strobel said. 

“We used University reserves to pay their salaries even though some of the work stopped when students left the campus and some of them were not able to work from home,” Strobel said. “The cost to cover salaries for employees who could not work was more than $25 million.”

OTHER SCHOOLS

Other schools across the nation — such as Stanford University, Harvard University, Columbia University and Cornell University — issued similar financial policies regarding students’ housing and dining costs during the spring semester.

In an email sent to Cornell students, the university said it would provide “on-campus students with emergency financial assistance to support their relocation expenses by offsetting the value of their remaining housing contract beyond March 29, 2020.”

Undergraduate students who resided in a residence hall at Columbia also received a prorated refund based on the day students were mandated to vacate their residence halls.

Not all schools issued refunds, however. Julia Coccaro, a sophomore at Barnard College last year, spent days waiting for answers from Barnard before she was notified that she would not receive a housing refund based on her financial aid package.

According to Coccaro, she wanted to use the refund to support living costs in New York City. Since she did not receive a refund from the school, Coccaro lived on campus in Morningside Heights for the remainder of Barnard’s spring semester.

As the pandemic draws on, colleges’ financial responses continue to vary across the country. While Yale’s budget allows the University to adapt in this changing time, some smaller colleges are cash-strapped and unable to do so.

MacMurray College in Illinois, for example, announced in May that it had to close after 174 years, making it the first higher education victim of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Rutgers University, a public school located in New Jersey, has reported they will lose $200 million in revenue due to COVID-19, according to university President Robert Barchi at a board of governors meeting earlier this year. A quarter of that — $50 million — will be used to refund students for unused campus services.

“Basically, I’m pretty grateful for the way Yale handled this whole situation in the little time we left for break to the time we were asked to not return,” Olivares said. “I know a lot of my friends from small liberal arts colleges who are also FGLI didn’t get refunds or aren’t currently getting paid for their on-campus jobs until the end of the school year. You know the only way Yale is able to do this is because of how much money it has, and I’m thankful that they actually used their budget to support students for the couple weeks left in the semester.”

You know the only way Yale is able to do this is because of how much money it has, and I’m thankful that they actually used their budget to support students for the couple weeks left in the semester.

—Abnner Olivares '22

FALL SEMESTER

While students like Thomas and Amir have applauded Yale’s efforts during the first few months of the pandemic, others say Yale still falls behind other schools for the fall 2020 semester.

In light of the transition to remote learning, some schools across the nation have offered tuition reductions for students. Earlier this summer, Princeton University announced a 10 percent reduction in tuition for the 2020–21 academic year. Georgetown University issued a similar tuition reduction for students not invited back to campus. Georgetown students returning to campus will be charged full tuition with a 20 percent reduction in housing and dining charges.

Meanwhile, tuition remains unchanged at Yale: $28,850 per term, or $57,700 for the full year.

“Given that our education is now cheaper to provide and of lower quality than in previous years, there is no justification for Yale not to lower its tuition, especially when students are already struggling to cover emergency costs during a global pandemic,” said outgoing Sophomore Council President Reilly Johnson ’22.

According to the official statement on Yale’s website, Yale College continues to invest in order to provide an “excellent education” to its undergraduate students.

“Whether they learn in person or remotely, or live on campus or off, they will be able to continue their education, earn full academic credit and benefit from the university’s personal, health and academic services,” the website reads.

An additional $388 per term was added to the unbilled cost of attendance for any term that a student is enrolled remotely. According to the financial aid website, this cost is for expenses such as “establishing, maintaining or improving your Internet service.”

In addition, students who are enrolled remotely are not charged for room and board, and the student share portion of their financial aid award is waived for the term they elect to enroll remotely.

The total estimated cost of attendance for a student in residence for the full year, enrolled remotely for the full year, or in residence for one term and enrolled remotely for one term is $78,850, $69,106 and $73,978 respectively.

In light of the financial impacts of the pandemic, Yale College is covering the cost of tuition for two summer courses in New Haven or online for first-year undergraduates and sophomores who enroll for the full 2020–21 academic year, with at least one semester conducted remotely, Strobel said.

“[Yale] is providing additional financial support for on-campus room and board to eligible students who receive financial aid” during the summer term, Strobel said. “Eligible students may instead apply the cost of tuition of those two courses toward the cost of tuition of two credits in a study abroad program led by a Yale faculty member. They may also, as a third option, apply the cost of tuition for the two courses toward a directed research experience.”

Amir, who is currently enrolled and living off campus in New Haven, said that he’s looking forward to the fall semester. In his view, the University has been “really accommodating” thus far.

According to Amir, he feels that the University has done a good job this semester of supporting him and ensuring that this semester of online education is better than the last, both due to improved financial aid for courses as well as improved online teaching from professors.

In his 3D modeling class this semester, Amir was provided a VR set and a laptop from the University. This, coupled with modified syllabi, gives Amir hope that Yale’s second semester of remote learning will be better than its first.

“I think that in some ways, the school is almost trying to compensate — maybe not compensate, but generously thank — its students for coming back the semester,” Amir said. “That’s kind of what it feels like.”

(Eric Wang)



TAKING IT TO THE STREETS: Fighting for food, housing and health

Published on May 13, 2020

Editor’s note: Jason and Mandy requested to use their first names for this story in order to protect their privacy.

Jason, a 33-year-old living on the streets of New Haven, was sitting under an overhang just off Yale’s campus, charging his phone and trying to stay out of the rain. The campus was deserted. Due to COVID-19 closures, most of the students who had left for spring break in March hadn’t come back. Even the tour groups, moving under their umbrellas across Old Campus, were gone. Between the stay-at-home orders and the rain, the streets of New Haven were empty.

With his phone finally charged, Jason began checking his voicemails for messages about housing for him and his partner, Mandy, 40. Since March 18, two days after New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker declared a state of emergency, the city began the weekslong process of emptying its shelters and relocating homeless residents to hotel rooms in the area. However, the unsheltered homeless, those like Jason and Mandy, who live in encampments, in abandoned buildings and on the streets, were last on the list.

When COVID-19 hit, New Haven’s homeless service providers mobilized quickly: Pantry and soup kitchen leadership worked hard to shore up gaps in food supply, case workers brainstormed alternatives to in-person appointments, and medical staff implemented new outreach strategies to ensure that essential services remained accessible to the most vulnerable. But even with providers working around the clock, people like Jason and Mandy are still slipping through the cracks.

It was wet and cold, but beneath the overhang, Jason and Mandy were dry. Two days before, while trying to find a power outlet, they had been caught in a downpour with nowhere to escape the rain. The warming centers around town had closed and all nonessential businesses had been shuttered since March 23. 

 “The worst thing about the rain is once you’re wet, you’re done.” Jason said. “Where are you going to get dry? There is no place to go.”

 In an hour, Jason and Mandy would trek one-and-a-half miles across town for a hot lunch at a church on Day Street, one of the few places open on Sundays. Soup kitchens across the city had switched to a grab-and-go model, and most of those still serving a hot meal were closed on the weekends. 

 Jason and Mandy rely on word of mouth to find meals. With fewer volunteers at the soup kitchens and pantries, the hours change often. The previous week, they’d arrived at the church just after 1:30 p.m., the usual lunch time, only to discover that the staff had started serving at 11:30 a.m. and had run out of food. On days when they cannot get a meal, they don’t eat at all, unless they pick through trash bins and scavenge whatever food they can find.

“You miss the bus and you just missed lunch, so now you could be going all day without food,” Jason said. “Then, say breakfast is at 7:30, 8:00 a.m., but we have a doctor’s appointment. We can’t make breakfast and now we have to wait until 12 p.m. for our first bite.”

Mandy has had a lot of doctor’s appointments lately. She’s six months pregnant with their first child. They’ve already chosen a name: Natalie, “birthday of the Lord,” since she found out she was pregnant on Christmas.

 “If she could get housed in a hotel, I would sleep on the street,” Jason said. “As long as she has a hotel, she gets a shower at the end of the day, she’ll be warm, she’ll have a bed.”

Unlike Mandy and Jason, those in the shelters were the first to be moved to hotels in mid-March. But, given Mandy’s pregnancy, Jason assumed she would be given priority. Jason prefers not to stay in shelters after having his belongings stolen while he was sleeping. Mandy previously stayed in a shelter, but left just before the pandemic hit. Now, even if she wanted to go back, it’s no longer an option.

Beatrice Codianni

 “Where can we go? The overflow shelter’s not even open,” Jason said. For now, the two are sleeping in an abandoned building. At night, Jason takes off his clothes, piling his shirt, overcoat and hoodie on the ground with blankets to create a makeshift bed for Mandy.

 Mandy worries about her child and the future of their family. She wants to keep her baby, but with limited food and no housing, she’s had to consider adoption. “Who thinks about giving their first child up for adoption because they don’t have a place to let her sleep?” she said, her voice breaking.“Who thinks like that?”

Living on the street has always been tough, but since COVID-19 arrived in New Haven, Mandy said that “now it’s even harder.”

FINDING FOOD ON THE FRONTLINES

On weekday mornings, before the pandemic began, Jason and Mandy liked to sit in the corner of Sunrise Cafe. A popular soup kitchen in the basement of St. Paul & St. James Church, Sunrise Cafe serves restaurant-style breakfasts to New Haven’s homeless and impoverished. For Jason and Mandy, it was about comfort and a sense of community.

Now, the tables, often set with brightly colored tablecloths and vases of flowers, are in storage. The folding chairs have been stacked away. Guests — who used to sit and socialize, drinking coffee and catching up with friends — are now only allowed to pick up prepackaged breakfasts from gloved and masked volunteers.

“It was a place where people could first of all just hang out and relax,” said André Medeiros, the executive director of Sunrise Cafe. “The real thing you don’t want to do is to lose contact with the population.”

The transition to grab-and-go meals has become the new norm for most of the city’s soup kitchens and pantries. “There is a need for community and solidarity in a time like this,” said James Cramer, the executive director of Loaves and Fishes, a food pantry that operates out of the same space as Sunrise Cafe. “We used to be really proud of the fact that we were a space where people could come and have a conversation and feel safe. That’s just not possible anymore because of COVID-19 concerns.”

Like Sunrise Cafe, Loaves and Fishes is more than just a place where people can get food. It provides an opportunity for guests who are disconnected from social services to interact with health care providers and outreach workers. For people who are new to homelessness, soup kitchens and pantries are usually the first points of contact for help with services such as housing and medical needs. With the COVID-19 outbreak, most of these services have all but evaporated.

Over the past two months, food pantry usership has doubled. Last week, Downtown Evening Soup Kitchen, or DESK, served more than 260 households, an increase of 120 families compared to this time last year. According to Connecticut’s Department of Labor, in March, over 7,600 Connecticut residents lost their jobs and food stamp applications quadrupled, putting additional strain on an already overburdened network of emergency food resources. Pantry numbers are projected to increase in the coming months.

Since the outbreak, hundreds of people have been turned away from large food distribution sites in New Haven after food ran out — at a recent distribution at Hamden Middle School organized by the Connecticut Food Bank, the line of waiting cars stretched almost a mile. Four hundred families left empty-handed.

“We are noticing a bunch of new people that we’ve never seen before,” said Dave O’Sullivan, the coordinator of Community Soup Kitchen across from the Yale bookstore on Broadway. “We are assuming they are people who were laid off from local restaurants or small businesses that are no longer operating.”

Many pantries are also operating with limited staff. Most volunteers used to come in with local religious service organizations and school groups. These days, those that come trickle in alone. For organizations like Sunrise Cafe, whose volunteer base is largely comprised of retirees and university students, the transition has been especially tough. Older residents have been advised against volunteering for their own safety and, with campus closures, most student volunteers are gone.

Others are concerned about interruptions in the food supply to pantries. For now, fresh produce and nutritious options are still available. Some pantries rely heavily on donations from restaurants and households. But with shutdowns, restaurants are no longer carrying a surplus of food and individuals are less likely to donate. The Connecticut Food Bank has stepped up to fill the deficit, but concerns remain about the nonprofit’s ability to meet the surging demand.

 “I think our greatest concern right now is what is going to be happening to the food supply in the coming months,” O’Sullivan said. “Meat processing plants are shutting down, truck drivers are getting ill. Is the food system in America on the edge of falling apart?”

 So far, there are large food distribution sites in Hamden, Dixwell, Fair Haven and West Haven. Food in Service to the Homebound, Mutual Aid, and Integrated Refugee & Immigrant Services have rolled out home delivery services, mainly for those who are elderly or immunocompromised. Many food pantries are transitioning to delivery as well. “We are moving toward eventually shutting down the kitchen in exchange for focusing on the deliveries,” said Steve Werlin, the executive director of DESK.

Mark Colville

The city’s new Pantry to Pantry program, created in response to COVID-19, is working to coordinate food deliveries and ensure that no one is left out. Housed out of the Coordinated Food Assistance Network, or CFAN, Pantry to Pantry is helping transition clients — many of them newly in need of food assistance — from regular pantry programming to receiving their meals at home, serving 750 to 950 people each week in the Greater New Haven area.

 “We still don’t know the size of the problem,” said Maria Markham, the CFAN COVID-19 Response Program director and coordinator of the Pantry to Pantry program. “We just know from what we’re seeing that it’s emerging and it’s going to be really, really huge.”

CFAN has helped prepare New Haven for this crisis, setting up emergency protocols that predate the pandemic. With the help of CFAN, New Haven recently created a searchable geographic information system (GIS) map with all the city’s active soup kitchens, food pantries and school distribution sites. The eventual goal is to coordinate a network of larger, weekly grab-and-go distribution sites for pickup across the city available to the unsheltered. As the pandemic grows, CFAN will continue to collaborate with the city to address food insecurity.

Nowhere is that food insecurity felt more strongly than among the city’s unsheltered.

At the Amistad Catholic Worker hospitality house on Rosette Street in the Hill, Mark Colville and his wife, Luz Catarineau-Colville, have always opened up their home to those without one. At Amistad, guests can shower, do laundry and receive a hot meal. They still allow people to enter the house, sit and eat, but are strict about upholding social distancing policies and hand-washing — guests are given everything from packets of sugar to plastic silverware, and are not allowed to touch anything. The Colvilles struggle to provide a sense of normalcy and keep up morale, trying hard to maintain the sense of community that defines Amistad.

 “We don’t want homeless people to feel disposable,” Catarineau-Colville remarked. “We want them to sit down, we want them to be comfortable. So everything was always our best: the coffee mugs, silverware and so on. But now everything is paper.” Amistad is the Colvilles’ home, and they worry that if either of them gets sick, they will have to close. But for now, they are determined to remain open.

“We treat our friends like family,” Catarineau-Colville said. “These are our friends, our family coming here to eat. We won’t stop serving meals unless we’re mandated by the city to do so. We don’t see ourselves as a shelter or a soup kitchen. This is our home, and all people are invited.”

HEALTH ON THE STREETS

Before the outbreak, Emma Lo, a street psychiatrist and assistant professor of psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, drove around the city each week to deliver on-the-spot care to the unsheltered homeless, meeting them in soup kitchens, at encampments or on the streets. Her goal was to offer mental health services and basic treatment often overlooked by providers.

In the field, Emma wore hospital scrubs to identify herself as a doctor and carried a medical kit to check blood pressure and pulse, screening patients for any potentially serious conditions. Her job was as much about building trust as it was about treating people. Along with her medical kit, she brought along granola bars, cough drops, water bottles and fresh socks to protect against infection and frostbite. But with the first case of the coronavirus in Connecticut, Lo’s priorities suddenly changed. Instead of outreach, her concern was now containment.

 These days when Lo goes out, she wears a mask along with scrubs and carries a thermometer and hygiene kits. In the car, she and her colleague sit diagonally, one in the driver’s seat and one on the opposite side in back, trying as best they can to maintain six feet of distance. Since the outbreak, they only go out once a week for two hours. It’s harder to find people now. As libraries, shelters and soup kitchens shut their doors, everyone scattered. The train station, one of the last places still open, now only allows ticketed passengers inside.

For those without shelter, the concern is not self-isolation or social distancing — it’s survival. Already May has produced some of the coldest weather on record for the East Coast, and at night the temperature continues to dip into the low 30s.

 “[The unsheltered homeless] don’t have a safe place to isolate on the street and often don’t have a place to social distance either,” Lo said. “They’re often relying on one another to stay warm.”

 Weather conditions have made unsheltered individuals even more vulnerable to the virus. For those sleeping outdoors, pneumonia is already a worry.

Lo explained that most of those who are homeless are too busy worrying about meeting their daily needs to focus on preventative care, and only seek help when the situation becomes desperate.

Many of the unsheltered also suffer from underlying conditions that put them at a greater risk of contracting and dying from the disease. Statistically, three-fourths of the homeless are cigarette smokers, a population that’s two times more likely to die from COVID-19 than nonsmokers. Additionally, as of 2019, more than half of the homeless in the U.S. are over 50 years old. In the past few years, New Haven in particular has seen an increase in the homeless population between the ages of 40 and 60. Those who make it past 60 are rare. On average, people who experience homelessness have a life expectancy of around 50 years old, almost 18 years shorter than that of the general population.

“There’s already a problem without COVID,” said Lo. “There’s just a huge amount of health disparity in the first place and it’s certainly magnified by the current situation.”

 So far, very few cases of COVID-19 have been reported among the homeless. But that doesn’t mean people don’t have it. After learning about a group of cases in the Pine Street Inn homeless shelter in Boston, the Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program sent kits to test everyone entering the shelter. Out of the 397 people tested, 146, or 36 percent, received a positive result, as reported by WBUR, Boston’s NPR affiliate. All of them were asymptomatic.

At Hill Regional Career High School, the city of New Haven has set up an emergency shelter for homeless individuals who test positive for the coronavirus but are not sick enough to require hospitalization. The shelter gives them a place where they can quarantine and recuperate, freeing up ICU beds desperately needed for others who are ill. So far, there are 9,260 coronavirus cases in New Haven County. On May 5, the city opened a drop-in resource center at Blake Field which offers COVID-19 testing for those on the streets. In a virtual press briefing that same day, Mayor Elicker said that more drop-in centers are still needed.

Carlah Esdaile-Bragg

“If we did test everybody who was homeless, we might find the same thing as in Boston,” Lo said. “We haven’t had a lot of homeless people with symptoms, but if you consider the asymptomatic cases, we totally don’t know.”

Lo’s presence itself could pose a risk. If infected, she could expose those living in encampments to the virus, endangering the very population she’s trying to protect. “I’m more likely to have it myself, based on my own exposure in a hospital, and to give it to them by accident,” Lo admitted. “I think it’s a tough balance. What’s really important is not to abandon our people on the street, because, in a crisis like this, they’re probably the first people to be ignored and tossed away.”

Phil Costello, colloquially known as “Dr. Phil,” an advanced practice registered nurse and the clinical director of homeless care at New Haven’s Cornell Scott Hill-Health Center, has moved many of his services to telehealth in order to minimize contact while continuing care through phone calls and virtual visits. Part of Lo’s team has as well. But, while telehealth is successful for some patients, Costello fears that much of the homeless population, who either don’t have a phone or struggle to find an outlet to charge theirs, may fall through the cracks.

For mental health services, the challenges are more than just logistical. Much of Lo’s work depends on social contact and intimacy, neither of which translate through a screen. “It’s really hard because street medicine relies on longitudinal, intimate, regular relationships and that’s certainly not really possible with this pandemic,” she said.

Despite the risks, Lo and the rest of the team have continued to go out each week, visiting as many encampments as they can, simply to remind people that they have not been forgotten.

“There’s less outreach going on in general, so people are more disconnected from the services they once had. There’s a lot of anxiety that I think is more related to the shutdowns of services than to the actual virus. They’re much more concerned about their housing and the future of what COVID is going to bring them,” Lo said. “It’s just more instability on top of instability.”

SEARCHING FOR SPACE, A HAVEN FOR THE HOMELESS

For over 38 years, Columbus House has provided a continuum of services for those experiencing homelessness in the Greater New Haven area. John Brooks, the Columbus House chief development officer, has worked with the organization for 16 years. “We’re a housing-first agency. Housing is health care. When someone is housed, they are better able to take care of their health,” Brooks said.

Columbus House provides shelter for single adults and families with children, offers a medical respite program, and helps people get back on their feet by connecting them with a variety of social services. Employment specialists help clients prepare resumes and look for work. Case managers connect some with substance use counselling. And on-site medical staff ensure residents’ medical needs are met.

As one of New Haven’s largest homeless service providers, Columbus House has helped thousands of homeless clients over the last three decades in New Haven and its surrounding communities.

When the COVID-19 pandemic first arose, Columbus House quickly started thinning out shelter space. With limited room between bunk beds, adhering to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s social distancing guidelines was impossible. At the time, the main shelter on Ella T. Grasso Boulevard housed 100 residents. The men’s seasonal overflow shelter housed 75 more. Others were housed in an emergency shelter in Wallingford.

Shelter staff started asking health screening questions of visitors and clients —  “How are you feeling?” “Have you been exposed to anyone who has tested positive for COVID-19?” After a couple of weeks, they began taking the temperatures of everyone who came inside. Soon, all volunteer activities were suspended, and outside visitors were barred. Staff were encouraged to work remotely.

The main shelter installed hand-washing stations in the lobby and dining room. Meal times were staggered. Masks, gloves, sanitizer and face shields were rationed out.

As the pandemic grew, 20 of the most vulnerable residents — those over 60 with underlying health issues — were rehoused in hotels in the area. Others were urged to temporarily stay with friends or family members. Those remaining in the shelter were encouraged not to leave.

“We were all holding our breath,” Brooks said, “We’re relieved it didn’t get into the shelter because it would have spread like wildfire.”

With the help of the city, Columbus House worked quickly to relocate its guests. Since March 15, Columbus House has moved over 95 people into permanent supportive housing, an unprecedented number. All other residents in congregate living spaces have been rehoused in area hotels.

To facilitate the transition, Columbus House and other shelters cooperated with the Coordinated Access Network, or CAN, a regional homeless crisis response system of 20 homeless and housing providers, municipalities and social service agencies. Prior to the pandemic, the Coordinated Access Network used the 2-1-1 hotline to assist callers in finding available shelter beds. Now, the hotline is also helping to connect the homeless with hotel beds.

In the past, callers could expect to schedule with a CAN specialist within a day. But due to the increase in demand, most people have had to wait at least a week for a phone appointment. “The biggest challenge with the homeless delivery system is there’s always more demand than supply,” said Kelly Fitzgerald, the director of CAN. “That’s true when it comes to CAN appointments, shelter space and housing resources.”

 According to Fitzgerald, as of May 6, there are still 365 people seeking shelter. 83 of those are unsheltered and do not want longer-term shelter space, but have agreed to enter a hotel to help them stay safe during the pandemic. Many of those on the waitlist were asked to leave the shelters voluntarily to reduce congestion. Some, who left temporarily, doubled up with friends or acquaintances in the area. Others have been sleeping on the streets. CAN is currently working with Columbus House, the Connecticut Mental Health Center and Liberty Community Services to organize outreach for those who remain unsheltered.

“The thing that’s been challenging is that we always seem to be waiting,” said Fitzgerald. “It might be we’re waiting for a contract to come through; we’re waiting for a funder to approve something; we’re waiting on staffing. We’re doing our best to have all of our ducks in a row, so that as soon as we get the green light, we can quickly put people into hotel rooms.”

More rooms may be opening up. The city’s initial deal with the Best Western in West Haven faltered after West Haven Police Chief Joseph Perno insisted that the hotel pay for police security. However, the deal was revived after Perno relented, and 96 rooms were set aside to house the homeless. According to Fitzgerald, the Best Western and the New Haven Village Suites will offer an additional 26 rooms for the homeless by next week. 

Alison Cunningham, former executive director of Columbus House and a consultant for the city’s COVID-19 homeless response efforts, praised the state’s swift action in relocating residents from shelters to hotels before the situation became dire.

 “What the state of Connecticut has done to protect and support people that experience homelessness is nothing less than extraordinary,” Cunningham said. “Look at what New York is doing and how long it took them to begin to hotel people. I’ve watched my colleagues scream and clamor for assistance. One of the first things that New York City did was to sweep people off the streets and tell them to go into shelters where 800 and 900 people are staying in very tight quarters.”

 Still, Cunningham recognizes that despite the city’s best efforts, housing everyone is an impossible task. “It’d be great if we could house 50 percent of the folks in the hotels,” Cunningham said. “That would be an amazing feat for Connecticut.”

Even with the added rooms, the demand for housing continues to outpace the supply. Providers are beginning to notice a change in the demographics of New Haven’s homeless population. With shutdowns and layoffs, many people are now living on the edge of homelessness. Others are arriving in New Haven from New York, taking the train from Grand Central and riding north until the end of the line.

 “We are seeing people from outside our region coming to Greater New Haven. So whether that’s people fleeing New York or people fleeing other parts of the state, we are starting to see people that we’ve never seen before,” Fitzgerald said.

Harold Shapiro

Fitzgerald suspects that the newcomers are arriving in search of services. Despite the challenges, providers in New Haven have pushed to remain open and continue to offer resources and support to the community.

 In the months ahead, however, those resources may dry up as the economy slows and more people find themselves out of work. Since Connecticut declared a public health emergency on March 10, it has accrued over 472,000 jobless claims, causing a five-week backlog in processing these applications. In 2019, only 180,000 claims were filed. Gov. Ned Lamont has extended the moratorium on evictions through July 1, but once the grace period ends, countless tenants could find themselves in debt or out on the street.

 “There are going to be new homeless folks over the next year, two, three, until the economy recovers,” Cunningham said. “Are we prepared for that? Right now, no.”

HOUSING FIRST 

For Jason and Mandy, who are both still living on the streets, help can’t come soon enough. “Housing is definitely number one.” Jason said. “But at the end of the day, we’re still out here.”

 Mandy’s recovery worker from Columbus House has continued to check in and bring her hand sanitizer, bottles of water and granola bars. “She cares,” Mandy said. “There are people that actually do and go above and beyond.”

 Jason misses Saturday mornings at Loaves and Fishes where they could get a cup of coffee, groceries and a bag of clean clothes. “It’s the little things you take for granted,” Jason said. “But, now they matter even more — now you gotta walk an hour and pray to God that you’re going to find food somewhere.”

Mandy’s due date is in August. At night, lying on the ground at Jason’s side, she can feel her daughter kicking. “It’s exciting, but I am also scared for my child,” Mandy said.

A representative from 2-1-1, Connecticut’s housing hotline operated by United Way, had promised that someone would call them about a hotel room. But, when Jason checked, there was no new message — just an old one from the CT Alert system with the recorded voice of Gov. Ned Lamont. “This is Governor Ned Lamont. I’m calling to urge you personally: Stay safe, stay home.”

But for those like Jason and Mandy, there’s no home to return to.